1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Watch Chickenshit Run!

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 1 08:55:18 2023
    Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
    wound?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 1 10:09:10 2023
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:56:25 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 12:31:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:30:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
    wound?

    Already have, troll.

    What did I say, folks? Watch Chickenshit run!

    Troll response.

    Pointing out that you ran isn't a "troll response" - that's merely a
    logical fallacy by you.

    And AGAIN you've refused to cite any evidence that the prosectors
    dissected the wound. Huckster has already stated that they did *NOT*
    dissect the throat wound.

    Is Huckster Sienzant a liar?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 1 09:31:04 2023
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:30:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
    wound?

    Already have, troll.

    What did I say, folks? Watch Chickenshit run!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 1 11:28:06 2023
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:11:37 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 1:09:30?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:56:25 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 12:31:09?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:30:04 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    On Friday, December 1, 2023 at 11:55:22?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
    Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat >>>>>> wound?

    Already have, troll.

    What did I say, folks? Watch Chickenshit run!

    Troll response.
    Pointing out that you ran isn't a "troll response" - that's merely a
    logical fallacy by you.

    And AGAIN you've refused to cite any evidence that the prosectors
    dissected the wound. Huckster has already stated that they did *NOT*
    dissect the throat wound.

    Is Huckster Sienzant a liar?

    Chickenshit ran again...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Dec 5 10:01:48 2023
    On Fri, 01 Dec 2023 08:55:18 -0800, Ben Holmes
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Can you cite for your claim that the prosector dissected JFK's throat
    wound?


    Chickenshit ran...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 5 11:11:23 2023
    On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:07:55 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    Who would believe a coward?

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 5 13:05:01 2023
    On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:39:29 -0800 (PST), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)