1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Hatred, not Oswald, killed JFK

    From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 26 08:01:38 2023
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Sep 26 10:32:37 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    The video begins with an oxymoron, "It is a logical assumption...". There is nothing logical about
    assumptions. Assumptions are conclusion made in lieu of evidence. There is nothing logical
    about that. Huntley seems to have assumed that because Dallas was a hotbed of far right
    radicals that must have been the reason JFK was assassinated there. As it turned out, the
    murder was committed by a far left radical for reasons known only to himself. We don't even
    know if he had a hatred of JFK. There is no evidence this was personal. There are a number of
    possible explanations for Oswald to kill JFK that would not require a personal hatred of the man.
    While we can speculate as to Oswald's motive(s), there is no way any of us can ever know what
    drove Oswald to do what he did.

    This editorial by Chet Huntley was hardly his finest hour. I'm not sure he had a finest hour during
    the years he teamed with David Brinkley for the nightly NBC News report. He was definitely the
    weaker half of that team. Brinkley proved to be the far more consequential member of the team
    after the two of them ended their tenures as NBC's co-anchors. Brinkley provided on air editorials
    for NBC' nightly news before moving on to ABC where he hosted the long running and popular
    Sunday morning panel discussion program.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Sep 26 10:45:13 2023
    On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:32:37 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    The video begins with an oxymoron, "It is a logical assumption...". There is nothing logical about
    assumptions. Assumptions are conclusion made in lieu of evidence. There is nothing logical
    about that.

    Google Bard calls you a liar.

    Is the term "logical assumption" an oxymoron?

    ***********************************************************
    Whether or not the term "logical assumption" is an oxymoron depends on
    how you define the terms "logical" and "assumption."

    Logical means based on or in accordance with the principles of logic.

    Assumption is something that is accepted as true or as likely to be
    true without proof.

    A logical assumption is therefore an assumption that is based on or in accordance with the principles of logic.

    Some people might argue that a logical assumption is an oxymoron
    because an assumption is, by definition, something that is not known
    to be true. In this sense, any assumption, even a logical one, could
    be considered a contradiction.

    However, others might argue that a logical assumption is not an
    oxymoron because it is possible to make assumptions that are based on
    evidence and that are consistent with the rules of logic. For example,
    if I assume that the sun will rise tomorrow, I am making a logical
    assumption because this assumption is based on evidence from the past.

    Ultimately, whether or not a logical assumption is an oxymoron is a
    matter of definition.

    In my opinion, the term "logical assumption" is not an oxymoron. I
    believe that it is possible to make assumptions that are based on
    evidence and that are consistent with the rules of logic. However, it
    is important to note that all assumptions are still assumptions, and
    they should therefore be carefully examined. *************************************************************

    And unlike Huxkster - who posts Google Bard comments that are PLAINLY
    AND OBVIOUSLY wrong, I stand by this answer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Tue Sep 26 11:53:35 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    Greed killed JFK. The fascists who run the US live to increase their wealth and power. JFK got in the way, so they murdered him. Nothing personal. Just business.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to Ben Holmes on Tue Sep 26 12:22:30 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:45:21 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
    On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:32:37 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
    <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39?AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    The video begins with an oxymoron, "It is a logical assumption...". There is nothing logical about
    assumptions. Assumptions are conclusion made in lieu of evidence. There is nothing logical
    about that.

    Troll response deleted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bud@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Tue Sep 26 12:31:24 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:32:38 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    The video begins with an oxymoron, "It is a logical assumption...". There is nothing logical about
    assumptions. Assumptions are conclusion made in lieu of evidence. There is nothing logical
    about that. Huntley seems to have assumed that because Dallas was a hotbed of far right
    radicals that must have been the reason JFK was assassinated there.

    They show their hypocrisy here.

    In another post, I wrote "The political literature implicates Oswald due to the political nature of the murder."

    The Forum Troll`s comment to this was "He's also been completely unable to show any "political nature" of the
    crime. It's mere speculation based on the victim."

    So Gil can speculate without evidence that because certain groups disliked Kennedy then they must be connected to his assassination, but the reasonable assumption that the assassination was politically motivated needs to be challenged.

    As it turned out, the
    murder was committed by a far left radical for reasons known only to himself. We don't even
    know if he had a hatred of JFK. There is no evidence this was personal. There are a number of
    possible explanations for Oswald to kill JFK that would not require a personal hatred of the man.
    While we can speculate as to Oswald's motive(s), there is no way any of us can ever know what
    drove Oswald to do what he did.

    This editorial by Chet Huntley was hardly his finest hour. I'm not sure he had a finest hour during
    the years he teamed with David Brinkley for the nightly NBC News report. He was definitely the
    weaker half of that team. Brinkley proved to be the far more consequential member of the team
    after the two of them ended their tenures as NBC's co-anchors. Brinkley provided on air editorials
    for NBC' nightly news before moving on to ABC where he hosted the long running and popular
    Sunday morning panel discussion program.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 26 13:08:07 2023
    On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT), Bud <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
    "virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

    Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
    that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
    get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

    It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
    where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

    So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gggg gggg@21:1/5 to NoTrueFlags Here on Tue Sep 26 14:37:06 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:53:36 AM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w
    Greed killed JFK. The fascists who run the US live to increase their wealth and power. JFK got in the way, so they murdered him. Nothing personal. Just business.

    In a capitalist society, doesn't every decision become just another 'business' decision?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NoTrueFlags Here@21:1/5 to gggg gggg on Tue Sep 26 18:10:19 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:37:07 PM UTC-4, gggg gggg wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:53:36 AM UTC-7, NoTrueFlags Here wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w
    Greed killed JFK. The fascists who run the US live to increase their wealth and power. JFK got in the way, so they murdered him. Nothing personal. Just business.
    In a capitalist society, doesn't every decision become just another 'business' decision?

    Yes. Capital is the god replacement in godless capitalism. It's not hate that killed Kennedy. It's LOVE, love of money, and money is power.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Wed Sep 27 04:37:18 2023
    On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:01:39 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALQhp6-j10w

    60 years ago, right wing extremists hated the Russians and anyone who was friendly with them.
    Today, left wing extremists hate Trump and anyone who is friendly with him.

    Kennedy was removed from office with bullets.
    Trump was removed from office with ballots.
    Nothing's changed.

    Extremism only destroys, it can never build anything.
    Yes, and it even sometimes assassinates leaders.
    Politics is a dangerous career.

    One day America's military will not be able to storm the beaches because of a shellfish allergy.
    They won't be able to advance on an enemy without first putting on their makeup and lipstick.
    Imagine having your whole military wiped out by a bag of gluten. Or an offensive phrase.

    The Deep State is alive and well.
    "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" -- The Who, "We won't get fooled again".
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q

    We haven't learned any lessons.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)