1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission - #23 - Just For Cowards Corbutt

    From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 21 07:28:05 2023
    Amusingly, even one of the Warren Commission staffers admitted that
    they'd lied in their report.

    "When the drafts of our final Report were presented for the
    Commissioners to review, their deference to Governor Connally was so
    great that they directed a revision in a major conclusion of the
    Commission that resulted in AN OUTRIGHT MISSTATEMENT OF FACT. This
    revision involved the single bullet theory; you will find it on page
    19 of the Report, Conclusion No. 3." - David Belin, "You Are The
    Jury", pg 347

    Belin recognized, as many do; that the SBT is *ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY*
    (Belin's words!) to the Warren Commission's theory. Without the SBT,
    conspiracy is *PROVEN*

    That the Warren Commission lied on much of the evidence is something
    I've shown time and time again - but here we have an actual Warren
    Commission Staff lawyer admitting that the Warren Commission
    *KNOWINGLY* published a lie.

    So... who was lying?

    David Belin?

    Or the Warren Commission?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Sep 22 07:06:16 2023
    On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:28:05 -0700, Ben Holmes
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    Amusingly, even one of the Warren Commission staffers admitted that
    they'd lied in their report.

    "When the drafts of our final Report were presented for the
    Commissioners to review, their deference to Governor Connally was so
    great that they directed a revision in a major conclusion of the
    Commission that resulted in AN OUTRIGHT MISSTATEMENT OF FACT. This
    revision involved the single bullet theory; you will find it on page
    19 of the Report, Conclusion No. 3." - David Belin, "You Are The
    Jury", pg 347

    Belin recognized, as many do; that the SBT is *ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY*
    (Belin's words!) to the Warren Commission's theory. Without the SBT, >conspiracy is *PROVEN*

    That the Warren Commission lied on much of the evidence is something
    I've shown time and time again - but here we have an actual Warren
    Commission Staff lawyer admitting that the Warren Commission
    *KNOWINGLY* published a lie.

    So... who was lying?

    David Belin?

    Or the Warren Commission?


    Huckster read this - and promptly turned tail and ran away to his safe
    place.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 22 07:30:17 2023
    From a memorandum written by Albert Jenner to Lee Rankin on April
    20th, 1964:

    **************************
    "Delivered herewith are three preliminary memoranda prepared by John
    Ely at my request made in late February or early March.

    My purpose was to obtain a chronology based on these existing data in
    our files of the background facts -- life, school, places of
    residence, etc -- of Mrs Oswald, her several marriages, her husbands
    and her three children and, in particular, Lee Harvey Oswald, from the
    time she married Edward John Pic, Jr., in the fall of 1929, to the
    time Lee Harvey Oswald entered military service in October, 1956.
    ...
    On the whole, Mr. Ely's memoranda present a good over-all picture of
    the course of events involving the Oswalds up to the time of Lee
    Harvey Oswald's entry into the military service Our depositions and
    examination of records and other data disclose that there are details
    in Mr. Ely's memoranda which will require material alteration and, in
    some instances, omission."
    ...
    **************************

    Let me repeat that last sentence one more time... regarding the
    historical details of Oswald and his family: "...THERE ARE DETAILS ...
    WHICH WILL REQUIRE MATERIAL ALTERATION AND, IN SOME INSTANCES,
    OMISSION."

    Now, since believers *FREQUENTLY* claim that Mark Lane is a "liar"
    based on the claim that he *omitted* something - can believers now
    admit that the Warren Commission lied?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)