On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 12:26:11 -0700 (PDT), donald willis
<
[email protected]> wrote:
Thought I'd make this fine Hank gaffe the headline:
Hank: > Willis attempts to argue that the person seen shooting couldn't be Oswald.
Wrong, Hank. I do believe that the person seen shooting was probably Oswald.
Hank: >To do that, he substitutes his own estimate of Oswald�s weight, estimating 140
Someone is jumping to concussions. That wasn't MY estimate--that was what was recorded in... The Warren Report. In other words, Hank, you're saying that the WR is arguing that the person seen shooting couldn't have been Oswald. Boy, are YOU desperate
for headlines... Now, even slandering the WR...
Or is it just that Hank hasn't read the WR?
dcw
Huckster Sienzant often ends up running away when it's pointed out
that he's wrong. He's incapable of admitting any error, and has
no-where else to turn but to run away.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)