In an endnote in his book "Reclaiming History", Vincent Bugliosi wrote
this:
"Fritz writes, �Claims 2nd Floor Coke when Off [Officer] came
in, to 1st fl had lunch, out with Bill Shelley in front. Left wk
[work] opinion nothing be done that day.� "
Greg,
The "commas" added by Mr. Bugliosi are necessary (and they are not
deceiving in the slightest way).
In an endnote in his book "Reclaiming History", Vincent Bugliosi wrote >this:
"Fritz writes, “Claims 2nd Floor Coke when Off [Officer] came
in, to 1st fl had lunch, out with Bill Shelley in front. Left wk
[work] opinion nothing be done that day.” "
Greg,
The "commas" added by Mr. Bugliosi are necessary (and they are not >deceiving in the slightest way).
When you change a quote by even so much as a comma, you are indeed
changing the quote, and it *IS* deceitful.
On Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 150:32:38 |
| Calls: | 12,091 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,597 |
