He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 9:34:03 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:occasionally poking his head out to see if the coast is clear.
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums andGil is what I call a "drive by" poster. He careens up to a particular thread and sprays a few poorly aimed shots that ricochet around, and then he lurches away in his pick-up truck, transmission groaning, back to the safety of mommy's basement,
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
As Gil has admitted, he's not real interested in what happened historically. He's the self-appointed Johnny "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!" Cochrane of the JFK assassination, obsessed with creating reasonable doubt for a mythical trial thatwill never happen.
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff. >He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in >occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and >I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his >nonsense elsewhere.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in >occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...
Such STUPIDITY!!!
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:08:42 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:occasionally poking his head out to see if the coast is clear.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 9:34:03 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums andGil is what I call a "drive by" poster. He careens up to a particular thread and sprays a few poorly aimed shots that ricochet around, and then he lurches away in his pick-up truck, transmission groaning, back to the safety of mommy's basement,
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
that will never happen.As Gil has admitted, he's not real interested in what happened historically. He's the self-appointed Johnny "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!" Cochrane of the JFK assassination, obsessed with creating reasonable doubt for a mythical trial
I suppose it's the most harmless way for him to deal with the voices in his head.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in >occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
Such STUPIDITY!!!
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
You literally can't explain what happened that day with any specificity.
As Trump would say, "Sad!"
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...
Such STUPIDITY!!!
How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
Such STUPIDITY!!!
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he has
You literally can't explain what happened that day with any specificity.
As Trump would say, "Sad!"
Yes, he did, but there were so many holes in it that refuting it was like shooting fish in a
barrel.
It made absolutely zero sense and didn't fit any of the evidence.
It demonstrated why CTs are so reluctant to ever post their own scenario.
If I really gave a shit what Benny thinks I'd go to the trouble of
finding it, but he doesn't matter so why bother. He's dead to me.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce >around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his >latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
Such STUPIDITY!!!
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he has
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
day as we did on 11/22/63.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:28:38 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:occasionally poking his head out to see if the coast is clear.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:08:42 AM UTC-4, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 9:34:03 AM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop inGil is what I call a "drive by" poster. He careens up to a particular thread and sprays a few poorly aimed shots that ricochet around, and then he lurches away in his pick-up truck, transmission groaning, back to the safety of mommy's basement,
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
that will never happen.As Gil has admitted, he's not real interested in what happened historically. He's the self-appointed Johnny "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!" Cochrane of the JFK assassination, obsessed with creating reasonable doubt for a mythical trial
I suppose it's the most harmless way for him to deal with the voices in his head.One suspects for some of these folks, that it is also perhaps the most therapeutic treatment for their particular psychosis.
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error... Such STUPIDITY!!!How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he has
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was firedthrough the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.
Here it is:[...]
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 10:10:17 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:has said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error... Such STUPIDITY!!!How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he
through the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.his "magnum opus" cleans your Marquette failed education clock... not to mention giving .john mcmadman extreme gas AND ran from this place on numerous occasions...
do you realize you, YOU have never posted a scenario of events concerning the assassination of JFK! And you been posting trash to ACJ for what 20+ years now? Total disgrace...
next
Here it is:[...]
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
diverting to Trump is a non-starter, Einstein... lying about case acts by commission or omission for 25+ years does leave a mark on ones soul...
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.You can say it... you can't prove it.
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >The Challenge - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 1 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 2a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 3a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 4 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 5 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 6 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 7 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 8 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 9 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 10 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 11b >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 12a >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 13 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 14 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >My Scenario - Part 15 >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >My Scenario - The Conclusion >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, andAnd again, you're simply lying.
sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
day as we did on 11/22/63.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed
happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was
behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of
the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING
these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.
Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ >>>The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ >>>My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ >>>My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ >>>
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.
A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed >>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was >>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of >>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, INotice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his claims.
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Indeed.
More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
And support it.
Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claim
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.
And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
Dead silence...His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue, you're simply a liar.
Notice the silence here...A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
Again, more silence from the coward.For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has
helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed >>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was >>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of >>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, INotice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his claims.
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Indeed.
More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
And support it.
Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claim
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.
And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
Dead silence...His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own
subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue, you're simply a liar.
Notice the silence here...A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
Again, more silence from the coward.For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and
sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that
day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth
to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 10:22:33?AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has >>>>> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed >>>>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was >>>>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of >>>>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING
these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
Notice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his
claims.
Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Indeed.
More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
And support it.
Chuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.
Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claim
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.
Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own >>>>> subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
Dead silence...
Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.
As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue,
you're simply a liar.
A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
Notice the silence here...
For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and >>>>> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that >>>>> day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth >>>> to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
Again, more silence from the coward.
Your fallacy here ...
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:00:54 PM UTC-5, David Healy wrote:has said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 10:10:17 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error... Such STUPIDITY!!!How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things he
through the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.his "magnum opus" cleans your Marquette failed education clock... not to mention giving .john mcmadman extreme gas AND ran from this place on numerous occasions...
do you realize you, YOU have never posted a scenario of events concerning the assassination of JFK! And you been posting trash to ACJ for what 20+ years now? Total disgrace...
next
Here it is:[...]
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
diverting to Trump is a non-starter, Einstein... lying about case acts by commission or omission for 25+ years does leave a mark on ones soul...((!!**HICCUP**!!))
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:30:07 PM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:he has said or positions he has embraced over time. Contradictions and manifest absurdities abounded.
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 11:00:54 PM UTC-5, David Healy wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 10:10:17 AM UTC-7, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 9:13:56 AM UTC-5, BT George wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 7:49:41 PM UTC-5, Chuck Schuyler wrote:
On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:37:12 AM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:
He hasn't posted anything since he stormed out of his latest thread in a huff.
He threw a real hissy fit after I posted several links to legal websites showing
his concept of chain of custody rules don't hold water.
When the McAdams group was still in business, Bob Harris used to drop in
occasionally. People who frequent other groups told me he would bounce
around from one forum to another, then leave after somebody refuted his
latest offering. Is that Gil's game too? I know he posts to other forums and
I wonder if he has decided to bail out of this one for a while and spread his
nonsense elsewhere.
Answering a post from a decade ago, and not realizing his error...How old is your "Mark Lane" series? You've been posting the same stuff for two decades.
Such STUPIDITY!!!
You know what you won't post? Your version of what happened on 11/22/63. Nothing from you. And sorry, your multi-segment Magnum Opus doesn't cut it. Nothing in it about how many shots were fired, how JFK's body was kidnapped, etc.
I think he did post his "scenario" a few years back if you can call such disconnected doubts and ramblings that. But you topped him by featuring a large (yet small enough to only be a statistical sampling of madness) number of the silly things
fired through the front windshield of the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or recreations for what he alleges, etc.No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was behind RFK's murder, a shot was
His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own subjective opinions and personal biases.his "magnum opus" cleans your Marquette failed education clock... not to mention giving .john mcmadman extreme gas AND ran from this place on numerous occasions...
do you realize you, YOU have never posted a scenario of events concerning the assassination of JFK! And you been posting trash to ACJ for what 20+ years now? Total disgrace...
next
Here it is:[...]
The Challenge - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
mom didn't burp your ass, so we have to do it, and you STILL shit on the rug...diverting to Trump is a non-starter, Einstein... lying about case acts by commission or omission for 25+ years does leave a mark on ones soul...((!!**HICCUP**!!))
Hey quick time out. Didn't you say a few months ago you were dealing with some health issues? If so, is everything going OK, or at least better, for the moment?
Just last night I was watching The Godfather II for the umpteenth time. In one scene Michael
Corleone observed, "Hyman Roth has been dying from the same heart attack for 20 years.".
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 11:22:33?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Notice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has >>>>> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed >>>>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was >>>>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of >>>>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He
can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING
these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
claims.
Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's
refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Indeed.
More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
And support it.
Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claimChuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
I`ve explained this to you several times now.
It was the change in pattern.
You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.
And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
Dead silence...His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden
shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own >>>>> subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue,Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people
did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.
you're simply a liar.
Notice the silence here...A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
Again, more silence from the coward.For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and >>>>> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that >>>>> day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth >>>> to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 11:22:33?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:37:38 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 12:30:28?PM UTC-5, Ben Holmes wrote:Notice folks, that Chuckles can't QUOTE what I wrote that matches his
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:10:15 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler
<[email protected]> wrote:
No, his "explanation" is what I call his "Magnum Opus," which he has >>>>> helpfully cut-and-pasted at this thread. None of the things he claimed >>>>> happened that day are explained. (LBJ ordered the "hit" and later was >>>>> behind RFK's murder, a shot was fired through the front windshield of >>>>> the limo, JFK's corpse was diverted for a secret autopsy, etc.) He >>>>> can't pinpoint what happened, he doesn't link to any tests or
recreations for what he alleges, etc.
Notice that Chuckles can't quote me saying ANY of these things he
claims I've stated...
Being the slippery, slithery, soil slug slime skank that you are, I
need to be careful how I answer you, because I can't quote you SAYING >>> these things, but you have WRITTEN these things.
claims.
Notice that the person being "a slippery, slithery, soil slug slime
skank" is clearly the one who STILL refuses to support his claims.
so no-one can judge the accuracy of Chuckles'
claims.
Nor can Chuckles state what *HE* thinks happened on 11/22/63 - he's >>>> refused each time I've asked.
I don't have...
Indeed.
More importantly, you simply *CAN'T* post what you believe.
And support it.
Then you're clearly quite dishonest. You've read that exact claimChuckles is a kook. He actually BELIEVES that if someone saw you
reading a newspaper, then months later denied that he'd seen you
reading a newspaper - THAT IT'S EVIDENCE THAT YOU'RE A MURDERER!
I specifically do not believe that.
from Bugliosi, and remained silent.
You saw Chickenshit defending that assertion... and said nothing.
I`ve explained this to you several times now.And I've refuted you each time.
It was the change in pattern.No, there was no change in pattern. The EARLIEST evidence shows that
Oswald did what he normally did.
You're going to have to deal with Chuckles... **HE** doesn't accept
what you're saying.
You saw David Von Penis accepting that assertion, and said nothing.
And now that he has - we see even more clearly his dishonesty.Chuckles can't deny it... watch folks!!
Dead silence...His entire Magnum Opus is just a series of begged questions, burden >>>>> shifting, and other assorted logical fallacies, based off of his own >>>>> subjective opinions and personal biases.
You can say it... you can't prove it.
As you won't take **ANY** authority outside of yourself on this issue,Here it is:
The Challenge - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/x4n7Di-GBd8/_WbEfALeAAAJ
The Challenge - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/WVBtmUQkx6c/9ZdyxAPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 1 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/y0hdkKgWvtI/3uukYgXeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/jSfe1BrGfJc/SOXAOQbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 2a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/kGfZPR4C-Lw/AlnRq1HeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/IShoUFao5OU/VuYGWFTeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 3a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/JFuasrnWRqA/l1vih03eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 4 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/LRMeWBFE1ug/bfjGTAbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 5 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/S1ddVKc3Jj4/IESJbFPeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 6 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/b5ODl3yA4uk/g77N-UreAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 7 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/rwmZjz92YC8/P-9Mn07eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 8 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c6e29olW6XA/Os29-FveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 9 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/ixNqGISHbrU/gd06wVHeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 10 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/3Di6kuseb2Q/aHbAQmLeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/sYEyPH0A_eI/IH-UZgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/aGduj6uaGUk/3eDp513eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 11b >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8rAmKZBOCiY/yCELq27eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/OnrH5R6ryHE/stjdfgbeAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 12a >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/J0A8N12PPHU/CcxpiU7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 13 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8hD-q0gTa_c/Co3ZJE7eAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 14 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/lsaXwhPRbEg/hZ7ZmEveAAAJ
My Scenario - Part 15 >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UA86YdJXEgY/JhG8o0reAAAJ
My Scenario - The Conclusion >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/UWfco_sGxYw/yApSPFXeAAAJ
The only thing Ben has figured out is that on 11/22/63, some people >>>>> did something.
That is, of course, PROVABLY a lie on your part, Chuckles.
Nah.
you're simply a liar.
Notice the silence here...A lie that no lurker could ever accept. So you're simply proving
yourself to be a moron.
Again, more silence from the coward.For Ben, it's all a head-scratching, shoulder-shrugging mystery, and >>>>> sixty years later, we know almost as little about what happened that >>>>> day as we did on 11/22/63.
And again, you're simply lying.
And this fact tells the tale - for if you *could*, you'd use the truth >>>> to debate. But you can't.
And you STILL refuse to give your scenario. WHAT COWARDICE!!!
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 7:08:32?PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
Non sequitur removed.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:53:58 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,961 |