1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. ALT.CONSPIRACY.JFK

  • Why Did The FBI Go To The Extraordinary Length Of Introducing Howard Br

    From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 16 23:52:51 2023
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had. That's
    why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 17 03:39:49 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:52:53 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had. That'
    s why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq

    What about this? What about this?

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gil Jesus@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Mon Jul 17 04:30:58 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    Here's a whole investigation for you to ignore.

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0005a.htm

    Tell THAT to your shrink.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Mon Jul 17 04:46:00 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:52:53 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had.
    That's why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq
    What about this? What about this?

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    See what I mean? You're just too stupid to make sense of the evidence.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chuck Schuyler@21:1/5 to Gil Jesus on Mon Jul 17 08:03:58 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:31:00 AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    Here's a whole investigation for you to ignore.

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0005a.htm

    Tell THAT to your shrink.

    From JFK's Presidential Library and Museum regarding the HSCA findings of a fourth shot:

    "Note to the reader: Point 1B in the link below to the findings of the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations states that the committee had found "a high probability that two gunmen fired" at the president. This conclusion resulted from the last-
    minute “discovery” of a Dallas police radio transmission tape that allegedly provided evidence that four or more shots were fired in Dealey Plaza. After the report appeared in print, acoustic experts analyzed the tape and proved conclusively that it
    was completely worthless—thus negating the finding in Point 1B."

    No fourth shot.

    Since the HSCA also concluded Oswald shot and killed JFK and Tippit, and since the fourth shot research has been debunked, we're right back at what the WCR concluded: Oswald alone, no KNOWN help.

    If you disagree with this, please provide your detailed assassination scenario so we can examine it. We're not in court, Johnny Cochrane. No reasonable doubt, no "this piece of evidence wouldn't be allowed at trial," nonsense. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
    HAPPENED AND BACK IT UP.

    Feel free to share your blockbuster work with the historians at JFK's library here:

    CONTACT US
    Address & Main Telephone
    The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum
    Columbia Point
    Boston, MA 02125
    1.866.JFK.1960
    1.617.514.1600
    TDD line: 617.514.1573

    Website Questions & Feedback
    If you have questions about our website or would like to report a bug or security issue, please use our Website Feedback Form.

    Contacts by Department
    Department Phone Email
    Administration 617.514.1541
    Archives Reference, Research Room, and Reproduction (textual) [email protected]
    Archives Reference, Research Room, and Reproduction (audiovisual) [email protected]
    Catering Services 617.514.1585
    Education & Public Programs 617.514.1581 [email protected]
    Ernest Hemingway Collection [email protected]
    Group Tours 617.514.1589 [email protected]
    JFK Library Foundation 617.514.1550 [email protected] Membership 617.514.1659 [email protected]
    Museum Collection [email protected]
    Press and Public Information 617.514.1574 [email protected]
    Profile in Courage Essay Contest [email protected]
    Social Media [email protected]
    Space Rental 617.514.1588 [email protected]
    Visitor Services 617.514.1569 [email protected]
    Lost and Found
    Please inquire at our Security Office regarding lost belongings at 617.514.1555.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sky Throne 19efppp@21:1/5 to John Corbett on Mon Jul 17 09:07:57 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 12:00:39 PM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:02 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:52:53 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had.
    That's why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq
    What about this? What about this?

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.
    See what I mean? You're just too stupid to make sense of the evidence.
    You didn't present any evidence. You presented an argument.

    https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Corbett@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 17 09:00:37 2023
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 7:46:02 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51 AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:52:53 AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had.
    That's why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq
    What about this? What about this?

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.
    See what I mean? You're just too stupid to make sense of the evidence.

    You didn't present any evidence. You presented an argument.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jul 19 07:03:38 2023
    On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 03:39:49 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:52:53?AM UTC-4, Sky Throne 19efppp wrote:
    The FBI never does this. I think this is the only example. The Warren Commission did this with Marina And Mrs. Whitworth, and that was also extraordinary. The WC wanted to prove that Marina and Whitworth had NOT met before. But of course they had.
    That's why the WC wanted to prove that they had not. So, why does the FBI want to prove that Brennan was the construction worker that Campbell had seen on the TSBD steps? Why bother? Who would even think that he was not? https://postlmg.cc/XZmcGfSq

    What about this? What about this?

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    The dozens of witnesses to a GK shooter is something you will
    ignore... you can't deal with it.

    You're a coward.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Holmes@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jul 19 07:03:38 2023
    On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:03:58 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Schuyler <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:31:00?AM UTC-5, Gil Jesus wrote:
    On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:39:51?AM UTC-4, John Corbett wrote:

    Same old shit. Never any evidence of a conspiracy.

    Here's a whole investigation for you to ignore.

    https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/hsca/report/html/HSCA_Report_0005a.htm

    Tell THAT to your shrink.

    From JFK's Presidential Library ...

    Not evidence... not relevant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)