On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 5:21:21 AM UTC-4, Gil Jesus wrote:
Why is every one of your posts an attack on another person ?
You post:
No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
You claim to have done your own research, but have no proof of it.
What you DO post are comments, speculation, opinion and insults.
A person can gain NO KNOWLEDGE from your posts.
This is what the clique does when they can't answer your points...They go after you with false accusations of research methodology failure and accuse you of what they are guilty of...It pays when you have a dirty moderator like Gordon because then it
appears like you are guilty of what they are accusing you of and were therefore moderated appropriately...All that is really happening here is Gil has found a cut & paste excuse he can post every time he's unable to answer my responses and he can use it
to aggressively blame me for his obvious failure to respond to the better evidence...
You can go back to the original Education Forum thread in 2016 and see that the usual alpha wolves attacked my attempt to simply do Peer Review on Davidson's enhancement that clearly showed Sarah Stanton looking back at you from Prayer Man's face...The
clique that Gil exploits is a group that is capable of taking the image of Sarah Stanton's face, clearly visible on Prayer Man, and turning it in to the presenter of that condemning evidence being a "Shit-Poster who was given chance after chance to stop
his antics"...You can go to that still-existing original 2016 thread and see Gordon coming in and doing moderator service for the Prayer Man supporters by changing the subject to my methodology and failure to present the best images etc...What was
happening is the Prayer Man crooks knew they had a favoring moderator so they PM'ed him false complaints about my methodology in order to draw the thread away from actual discussion of the evidence...Gordon dutifully acted upon their complaints and the
topic suddenly switched to me and my not being fit for the forum because I refused to follow evidence procedures when instructed...I was being threatened with termination of site membership by people who were guilty of what they were accusing me of...In
the 7 years since, I have never seen any Education Forum moderator ride a member's back on every point in every post like Gordon did to me...Yet, somehow this translates in to "Why do you attack people in every post?" being asked by an insincere person
whose real motive is avoiding the real question of "Why did the Education Forum membership ignore good evidence?"...By means of a dirty moderator with a clear bias towards the Prayer Man theory and the posters who supported it, the original issue of the
legitimacy of Davidson was dodged and the presenter was permanently banned...7 years later no credible Peer Review has ever been done of Davidson by the people who ban because they allegedly demand Peer Review...Gordon banned me because he knew the 95%
board majority I had out-argued would never protest the silencing of the guy who disproved them...He's an English crook...
What Gil is doing above is dog-whistling to the clique that somehow I am not fit to post amongst the research community due to lack of skill...Gil knows exactly what he is doing and the reason he's doing it at this moment is because he is aware he has
badly failed to answer my evidence and arguments...Gordon and the Prayer Man people did the same thing in the original 2016 thread...They hijacked the thread and falsely accused me of failing research rigor...Like Gil, they did that because they were
trying to avoid admitting that they had badly failed to answer the Davidson enhancement and my height argument...I mean talk about the balls of saying that to the guy who single-handedly refuted the Prayer Man theory and also discovered the most
important research discovery in 45 years...Wolves like to hunt in packs but they also like to kill...And that is what Gil is doing here...He's viciously going for the personal attack kill by falsely portraying me as failing to practice required research
standards...It worked with that scumbag Gordon so it should work this time too...But, if you noticed, I challenged Gil to pick any of my claims and show where they did not originate from the known evidence...Instead of doing that Gil repeated his Mickey
Mouse form answer whose design is obviously to shift the focus to me instead of answering my evidence...The corrupted community (clique) is accusing me of what they are guilty of and they are trying to use it to justify pathetic censorship and exclusion..
.And, so, Gil once again avoids answering why he is quoting the FBI's lies against the main Conspiracy witness Carolyn Arnold...
If I were allowed to post on the Education Forum by the criminals who censored me I would point-out that any obtaining of the original Wiegman Film would show that once Davidson's digital enhancement process were applied to it that Sarah Stanton's face,
as seen in Davidson, would be exactly reproduced from it...The identical repeating of Davidson's enhancement from the original Wiegman Film would prove on a scientific basis that Stanton's face was a real and existing thing on the original Wiegman
celluloid and that Davidson's method was legitimate and had passed scientific Peer Review...Gil isn't too bright so I think that he won't get this even when explained...However there are people on the Education Forum who are smart enough to understand
why this is conclusive proof...In the years that I have been posting this it has been universally ignored and I have never seen it posted or discussed on any of the forums the Prayer Man hijackers control...So while the ignoramus and incompetent James
Gordon is going around bragging how he banned me from his board for allegedly failing to practice the best research practices, it is actually himself who keeps this best evidence from his board and violates what he accuses me of...The true record shows
who the real attackers are and why...All I am guilty of is trying to present the correct Prayer Man evidence...Although they lie and say they practice strict rigor, any intelligent person can see the clique operates by who they like and who they don't
like...The division clearly goes accordingly...Anyone who takes away a skilled researcher's right to participate amongst his peers because he presented correct evidence is a monster...I'm not the one who should be answering the questions here...An entire
research community is remaining unaccountably silent in front of important correct evidence...
I have every right to criticize Leslie Sharp's style...I think she is undermining her own case by failing to articulate it clearly...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)