TURMEL: Reply for Supreme Court Covid False Alarm Aylen appeal

John C. Turmel, B. Eng.,
68 Brant Ave., Brantford, N3T 3H1,
Tel/Fax: 519-753-5122, Cell: 519-209-1848
Email: [email protected]

Tuesday Jan 31 2023

Ms. Chantal Carbonneau, Registrar
Supreme Court of Canada,
301 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1
Email: [email protected]

Dear Registrar:

Re: TURMEL, John v His Majesty the King, File No. 40520

Please accept this letter as the Applicant's Reply for the
application for leave to appeal in this matter.

Prothonotary Aylen struck the claim finding insufficient
material facts necessary to satisfy the individual elements
of any specific Charter infringement. Not found to be
material facts were:
1) WHO's comparing the Covid 3.4% CFR "Case Fatality Rate"
"Apple" not to Flu's known 10% CFR "Apple" but to the 100-
times smaller Flu 0.1% IFR "Infection Fatality Rate"
"Orange" to exaggerate the threat by a hundredfold;
2) WHO finding "no documented asymptomatic transmission" and
testing 10 million in Wuhan to find zero transmission by
asymptomatics;
3) CTV deleting that there had only been 166 Canadian Covid
fatalities not in long-term-care;
4) PCR Test set too sensitive to register false positives;
5) CDC Death Certificate Guidelines changed to register
"Death with Covid" with "Death from Covid" to hype deaths by
a factor of 16. CDC reports only 6% were deaths from Covid
alone.
6) Publication of a bogus study later withdrawn by Lancet
and New England Journal of Medicine to discredit
HydroxyChloroQuine HCQ and over-dosing patients to lose
25.7% in the Bill Gates Oxford Recovery test with 9.6 times
the 1 gram dosage given by Didier Raoult in France's HCQ
test that lost under 1%, 32 times less.

Prothonotary Aylen found that the claim was an abuse of
process stating it contained bare assertions that the
Defendant could not know how to answer, and was replete with
lengthy diatribes, scandalous and extreme allegations.

What answer can there be to righteous allegations? To
explain how our rulers were suckered by an Apple Orange mis-
comparison to impose deadly restrictions?

Bare allegations are not lengthy diatribes. My written
representations abide by the engineering KISS principle:
Keep It Super Simple.

Showing the over-dosing Bill Gates deliberately inflicted on
patients to discredit HCQ and get an Emergency Use
Authorization for his vaccine was a scandalous and extreme
allegation of mass murder but sadly true.

Respondent argues the proposed appeal does not raise an
issue of public importance and would serve no purpose.
Applicant submits exposing how Canadians were tricked into
lockdowns and then coerced to take the clot shot to escape
house arrest or keep their jobs is an issue of national
importance, especially when pressure to take the clot shot
and to punish doctors who disagree persists. It would alert
Canadians that they should stop poisoning their children and
themselves over a false alarm and now focus on saving
themselves.

Judge Aylen ruled it would be unprecedented to declare "any"
restriction unconstitutional without a specific restriction
to strike down. Little comfort now that excess death and
infertility have risen all around the vaccinated world but
not in unvaccinated Africa where HCQ and Ivermectin were not
banned. The control of governments and medical colleges to
suppress treatments that work and send the infected home
without treatment until they could return sick enough to
intubated to death shows a genocidal psy-op of incredible
evil.

All the death and destruction could have been avoided had
the courts not suppressed that Covid Mortality Hyped
Hundredfold was a false alarm by Apple-Orange miscomparison.
But the mortality threat from the vaccine was not a false
alarm. As an engineer who studied fluid mechanics, I knew
that programming our cells to produce spikes would disrupt
laminar flow in capillaries causing turbulence and blood
clots.

On July 6 2022, CTV reported that "unknown," first listed in
2019 as a cause of death, was the top cause of death in
2021.

The Court should have set the precedent of allowing a claim
for a declaration that any restriction for a false alarm was
unconstitutional to be heard. Refusing to set a precedent
that would have saved so many lives was an error I hope this
Court does not follow.

____________________________
John C. Turmel B. Eng.

cc: James Schneider, Counsel
National Litigation Sector
Department of Justice Canada
120 Adelaide Street West Suite #400
Toronto, ON M5H 1T1

JCT: So now the file is going to be sent to 3 judges of the
court to decide whether they let it be heard by the full
court. And if they say no, I'll be blaming them for every
sudden death I find out about and share to my
http://gab.com/johnturmel or http://librti.com/johnturmel
uncensored pages.

I think this is and will be the only challenge to the
vaccine mandates to reach the Supreme Court. Former
Newfoundland Premier Brian Peckford's and People Party
leader Maxime Bernier's challenges are dismissed in the
lower courts as mooted now that the air travel restrictions
are lifted.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)