In article <th1aht$biim$[email protected]>, Ubiquitous
<[email protected]> wrote:

In article <270920221232036182%[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:

Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2022-09-27 9:40 AM, A Friend wrote:

Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2022-09-27 1:18 AM, David Johnston wrote:

The proposition that an astronaut could die in space and NASA could get >>>>> away with not announcing what happened in detail, is simply absurd >>>>>

On the other hand, if it had been a Soviet or Chinese astronaut, it
would have been par for the course.

Again, Challenger. Wise up, gang.

I heard you and nothing you said refutes anything I said. Saying it a
second time still doesn't refute anything I said.

In fact, NASA's p.r. re the Challenger disaster refutes everything you >said. NASA clammed up on Challenger. First they claimed they were
doing so for the sake of the families, and then they said it was a
matter of national security. I lost track of their lies after that.

But you want it clear and loud? Fine. You're ignoring what NASA said
and the way they acted in the wake of the Challenger disaster. You
need to take another look into this.

Wow, I didn't realize there existed Challenger comspiracy theories before now!

I was working news back then. All of a sudden, and for the first time,
NASA was suddenly facing an unfriendly press and didn't know how to
handle it. NASA did everything wrong.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

anim8rfsk <[email protected]> wrote:

Ubiquitous <[email protected]> wrote:

. . .

Wow, I didn't realize there existed Challenger comspiracy theories
before now!

Oh, sure. There's a conspiracy theory about everything. Remember Kanye West >saying that President Bush hit New Orleans with Hurricane Katrina >intentionally?

I'm trying to imagine anybody conspiring with Kanye.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article
<[email protected]>,
anim8rfsk <[email protected]> wrote:

Ubiquitous <[email protected]> wrote:

In article <270920221232036182%[email protected]>, [email protected] wrote:

Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2022-09-27 9:40 AM, A Friend wrote:

Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:

On 2022-09-27 1:18 AM, David Johnston wrote:

The proposition that an astronaut could die in space and NASA
could get away with not announcing what happened in detail, is
simply absurd

On the other hand, if it had been a Soviet or Chinese astronaut, it >>>>> would have been par for the course.

Again, Challenger. Wise up, gang.

I heard you and nothing you said refutes anything I said. Saying it a
second time still doesn't refute anything I said.

In fact, NASA's p.r. re the Challenger disaster refutes everything you
said. NASA clammed up on Challenger. First they claimed they were
doing so for the sake of the families, and then they said it was a
matter of national security. I lost track of their lies after that.

But you want it clear and loud? Fine. You're ignoring what NASA said
and the way they acted in the wake of the Challenger disaster. You
need to take another look into this.

Wow, I didn't realize there existed Challenger comspiracy theories before now!

Oh, sure. There’s a conspiracy theory about everything. Remember Kanye West saying that President Bush hit New Orleans with Hurricane Katrina intentionally?

That's not a conspiracy theory. Bush dipped his finger into the waters
of the Gulf and conjured a hurricane to destroy the Chocolate City.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 04:30:45 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
wrote:

In fact, NASA's p.r. re the Challenger disaster refutes everything you >>said. NASA clammed up on Challenger. First they claimed they were
doing so for the sake of the families, and then they said it was a
matter of national security. I lost track of their lies after that.

But you want it clear and loud? Fine. You're ignoring what NASA said
and the way they acted in the wake of the Challenger disaster. You
need to take another look into this.

Wow, I didn't realize there existed Challenger comspiracy theories before now!

Far easier to believe lousy dumb luck or incompetent construction than
a conspiracy theory.

I well remember sitting in the coffee shop taking a longer than usual
coffee break that day in Jan 1986. Heard a lot of "Holy SH**!" and
"Did you see THAT?!?" that morning and by the end of the day the sick
jokes ("don't tell anybody but NASA stands for 'Need Another Seven Astronauts'") were already going around.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

To: Adam H. Kerman

Adam H. Kerman wrote to alt.conspiracy <=-

I'm trying to imagine anybody conspiring with Kanye.

Kanye West *is* a conspiracy theory.

-+- Brightening your day. -Bex <3

... "Time has a way of getting away from us, because we never have a grip on it

--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
--- Synchronet 3.19c-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
* realitycheckBBS - Aptos, CA - telnet://realitycheckbbs.org

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)