XPost: alt.slack, alt.morons
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 14:23:10 GMT, Doc Hammerslack
<
[email protected]> wrote:
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Sat, 11 Jan 2025 04:08:56 -0800, KWills
wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 10:28:32 GMT, Doc Hammerslack
<[email protected]> wrote:
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Fri, 10 Jan 2025 02:37:06 -0800, KWills >>>wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 13:04:54 GMT, Doc Hammerslack
<[email protected]> wrote:
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Thu, 9 Jan 2025 05:49:16 -0700, % wrote: >>>>>
Doc Hammerslack wrote:
NOTICE: The DOCTOR is ON...at Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:04:02 +0100
(CET), Nomen
Nescio wrote:
We need ice from Greenland to be dumped on sin city!
(Too soon?)
ok then keep gulping
I love when the dipwits start chasing me around on Usenet.
Don't follow % to any other groups he posts to. When you do that, >>>> as you did above, it shows you are the one following.
And before you can even try to project your behavior onto me,
I've been in alt.conspiracy since 1995 or 1996. I would need to check
an archive to be more specific, and it's not that important.
Um...what?
You accused % of "...chasing [you] around on Usenet." His reading
and posting to a group you posted something to can't, to the rational
mind, be called chasing you.
Nice strawman.
When you're reduced to lying, you've lost.
It's not the fact that he posted to alt.slack, but that he
humps my posts, as he did earlier in this thread.
One reply is humping? You're desperate.
If you paid any attention, he previously (in AC) made the same
statement, so if you don't recognize me pointing out his
hypocrisy (and the irony), please pay better attention. kthx.
I presume you mean alt.checkmate. If you paid any attention, you
would know I don't read the group. I'll reply to cross posts sent to alt.usenet.kooks. I've mentioned this a number of times.
I also mention, less often, that I could migrate over to
alt.checkmate, but it's not important enough for me to bother.
Please pay better attention :)
Group list restored.
Whatever.
Sometimes, I think you like to argue just to argue. (You'd
think this was Usenet or something!)
I know, based on the evidence you present, you get embarrassed
easily and lash out in an futile attempt to avoid the truth. This
discussion is not the first time I've seen it.
It is possible it's simply a persona you play on Usenet. It may
be an accurate representation of you in real life. I can't know. And,
more importantly, I don't really care.
--
KWills
Strategic Writer,
Psychotronic World Dominator.
And FEMA camp counselor.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)