TURMEL: Vexatious Litigant Appeal Tues 9:30 180 Queen St. W. Toronto
So my appeal against being declared a vexatious litigant is
Tues Sep 26 2023 9:30am at 180 Queen St. W. Toronto. I'll
also ask if my a vexatious litigant bars others from filing
my templates.
The court is going to have to find that
1) I filed repeated actions against the CRTC not to get
quantitatively equitable free time in partisan political
debates but to vex them.
2)a) I filed actions against banks not to abolish interest
rates for the good of humanity but to vex them;
c)b) I used templates not to help foreclosed debtors avoid
eviction but to vex the banks.
3) I sued Dragons Den not because they libeled me but to vex
them.
4)a) I filed many actions to strike the prohibitions on
cannabis forcing the Crown to stay 4,000 possession charges
in 2002 not because it was a valuable medication but to vex
the Crown;
b) I published self-defence templates not to help those
charged avoid criminal records but to vex the Crown;
c) I published templates not to help those who had had their
permits cancelled by the Court to get their permits back but
to vex the Crown;
c) I published templates not to help those who had their
permits stalled get damages for lost rent and pot, and
expedite delivery if not yet processed, but to vex the
Crown;
d) I published templates not to help high dosers strike down
the 150-gram cap imposed by the court but to vex the Crown.
e) I published templates not to help patients oppose
- Failure to provide juice and oil;
- annual authorization for permanent illnesses;
- Cap on patients per grower and licenses per site
5) I published templates not help people avoid restrictions
for the Covid false alarm but to vex the Crown. I was hit
with $3000 in court costs and the other 80 were hit with
$500 each. So I started a GiveSendGo to help pay the costs
of those who tried to warn the world Covid was a false alarm
needing no vax:
http://givesendgo.com/covidfalsealarmcourtcosts
As you can see, these are all good deeds and I'm proud of
them all. None are frivolous and n one vexatious.
Only one was vexatious. In 1977, I had been busted and
convicted as Ottawa's Gambling Crusader for trying to run
legal blackjack games. Then in 1978, the Supreme Court
Rockert decision ruled a 1-night stand was not a gaming
house because it did not impugn the reputation of the
neighborhood. So I started running transient disco-casino
all around town. So the Crown charged me with possession of
a gambling device, the cards, and Judge Bernie Ryan said "it
made anyone who played a game in his home guilty" before
fining me $200 as the last person in Canadian history
convicted of possession of a deck of cards.
So to vex them, I laid an information against Simpsons Sears
for possessing cards for sale. I was only vexing them back.
So let's see if the court decides that all my actions were
not good deeds to help victims but only to vex the Crown.
The whole Memorandum is at
http://SmartestMan.Ca/s40fcam.pdf
We'll find out if I can't do any more good deeds helping
victims of government oppression.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)