• OT: Microsoft product (and service) naming (was: Re: Alternative for re

    From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Mon Aug 11 14:36:33 2025
    On 2025/8/11 14:19:6, VanguardLH wrote:

    []

    Microsoft keeps moving the target on the names of their products. Oh
    yes, Outlook new (yes, the lowercased "new' is part of the product name) replaced Mail (which had several incarnations across Windows versions). Microsoft keeps moving the target on the names of their bundles, too.
    There are product names now which differ from what they were called
    before. Gee, all I have to do is change the name plate on my car, and
    presto chango I have a new car. Changing names is how Microsoft hopes
    to con users something is new.

    I couldn't agree more. Didn't help when they had (maybe still have) a
    hosting etc. service/company called Outlook, as well as software called
    Outlook (and Outlook Express, too).

    They once had an office suite called Works, which included a word
    processor, a spreadsheet, and I think one or two others (something
    graphical maybe?). Not only was it substantially cheaper than Office
    (which was so expensive you could buy the individual parts, like Word
    and Excel, separately at that time), but it also was much less demanding
    in resource requirements. It did most of what the average home user
    required. Towards the end of its existence, it came with Word rather
    than its original WP, since WP was the part most users used. I'm pretty
    sure Works was finally killed off because it was eating into the
    profits/sales of the full Office.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    We're done for the night. I'm off for a cup of tea and some crystal meth.
    Only joking. I've had quite enough tea for one day.
    - Victoria Coren Mitchell, quoted in RT 2017/10/7013

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)