On Thu, 5/8/2025 9:11 AM, Ed Cryer wrote:
I'd appreciate some expert comment on the reliability of this device; https://www.poundland.co.uk/usb-charging-tower
I regularly leave devices (tablets and phones) on charge overnight, but they have independent adaptors. I'm not quite sure just why, but I feel reluctant to use this tower with (let's say) three devices plugged in.
Ed
It could be implying the BC standard, which is 5V @ 1.5A max.
Then, three devices would "fit" into the 5 amp limit as 4.5A .
There might be some statements of fact, accompanying your fleet
of devices, better enabling you to determine what percentage
of the fleet will "work good" with the tower.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#BCS
Part of becoming a Battery Charging wizard, is acquiring a
USB current meter. There are piss-weak designs with poor display
capability. And there are meters with both USb-A and USB-C connectors
and they also observe USB-PD negotiation and print not only
the consumption at the moment, but also, what the negotiated
limits are. By inserting a metering device between the source
and sink, it allows you to better understand what the sink
device is doing (standard charge or quick charge), and perhaps,
what "triggers" certain behaviors.
The tower is too cheap to be particularly intelligent, and
my guess is it limits to 1.5 amps. Some Apple devices charge
at 1 A or 2 A, and if they detect one of the older charging
methods, they would switch to the 1 A method.
The tower PSU would have a 5A current limiter, and switch off
on overcurrent or overheat. The individual ports could have
a Polyfuse on them, set to 2.2A on each port. But at that
price point, it's a little foolish to assume any sort of
"special circuits" in there, and it might not have any
protections at all.
But at least, for the companies making the power adapter,
they do have good compliance with common sense,
and some of the junk they used to sell, has been shown the door.
There was one year, where USB to SATA/IDE adapters for the
bench, the adapters provided with those, were blowing like crazy
and ruining hard drives. Then the year after that, it stopped.
I think somehow, the riot act was read to those people.
and anecdotally, they cleaned up their act. Whether it was
a series of better silicon solutions that did it, I don't know.
Not many adapters are sawed open and reverse engineered now.
Charge one device, verify surface temperature of the
"active" part of the circuit for peak temperature. Charge
two devices, verify surface temperature. If the design
is too cheap to be realized, I would hope the thermal
signature would hint at how well it works. Where ever the
mains plug is located, that's where the SMPS will be for it.
Adapter makers, don't like long mains cable paths. If there
is to be a long mains cable path, the cabling is modular and
separates from the module.
Paul
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)