• What is critical Windows 11 hardware

    From Oliver@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 4 01:15:10 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    I have a BIOS (not UEFI) desktop so I read this with interest.
    Microsoft hides workaround for installing Windows 11 on older PCs https://www.techspot.com/news/106619-microsoft-hides-official-workaround-installing-windows-11-older.html

    What they say is Microsoft has been routinely removing its online support articles about Windows 11. The "ways to install" the operating system have recently been revised, and there are now no official workarounds for
    installing the latest Windows release to unsupported, older machines.

    But what is really critical hardware for Windows 11?
    Versus what is just nice to have (which I probably do not have)?

    Apparently one issue is TPM 2.0 which I don't have, as I entered tpm.msc trusted platform module management console which said I don't have it.

    But apparently you don't really need TPM 2.0 so it's confusing what is
    actually critical for installing Windows 11 vs which is just nice to have.

    But they provided a wayback machine snapshot of the missing page. https://web.archive.org/web/20240929145620/https:/support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Before I do any of that to upgrade to Windows 11, what else should I test
    on my desktop PC which is currently running Windows 10 Pro?

    All I want to test for is the presence (or not) of just the most critical mandatory Windows-11-required hardware as I won't have the nice-to-have hw.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Oliver on Tue Feb 4 06:39:10 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Tue, 2/4/2025 3:15 AM, Oliver wrote:
    I have a BIOS (not UEFI) desktop so I read this with interest.
    Microsoft hides workaround for installing Windows 11 on older PCs https://www.techspot.com/news/106619-microsoft-hides-official-workaround-installing-windows-11-older.html

    What they say is Microsoft has been routinely removing its online support articles about Windows 11. The "ways to install" the operating system have recently been revised, and there are now no official workarounds for installing the latest Windows release to unsupported, older machines.

    But what is really critical hardware for Windows 11?
    Versus what is just nice to have (which I probably do not have)?

    Apparently one issue is TPM 2.0 which I don't have, as I entered tpm.msc trusted platform module management console which said I don't have it.

    But apparently you don't really need TPM 2.0 so it's confusing what is actually critical for installing Windows 11 vs which is just nice to have.

    But they provided a wayback machine snapshot of the missing page. https://web.archive.org/web/20240929145620/https:/support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Before I do any of that to upgrade to Windows 11, what else should I test
    on my desktop PC which is currently running Windows 10 Pro?

    All I want to test for is the presence (or not) of just the most critical mandatory Windows-11-required hardware as I won't have the nice-to-have hw.

    Don't waste your time on this HealthCheck...

    For example, this could refuse to run, claiming
    "Your organization controls Windows Update". I had to change drives
    a couple times, until I found an OS ready to roll.

    https://aka.ms/GetPCHealthCheckApp

    Name: WindowsPCHealthCheckSetup.msi
    Size: 14,348,288 bytes (13 MiB)
    SHA256: DF9F81457E7FC9D670EB9A329ED55E3D7BA2DE4DC4D71E7FCC246239D27BEF04

    Yellow: This PC must support Secure Boot [UEFI BIOS feature, code for TPM based attestation]
    Yellow: TPM 2.0 must be supported and enabled on this PC.
    TPM not detected.

    Red: The processor isn't currently supported for Windows 11.
    Intel Core i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHz

    ["Not on the approved list" <snicker>]
    [Lacks MBEC support (now listed on ark.intel.com entries which support the feature) ]
    [Does have POPCNT/SSE42 instruction (installer blocks without this) E8400 lacks this ]
    [Does have VT-X Support (sandboxing, WSL2, HyperV) ]

    Green: There is at least 4 GB of system memory (RAM). [Needs more really] Green: The system disk is 64 GB or larger.
    Green: The processor has two or more cores [Six cores is a good number].

    Install the OS on a capable PC, move the hard drive over
    to the non-capable PC. What happens ? It turns off a bunch
    of features and boots like it was Windows 10.

    For example, the PC in the above description, is running Windows 11 right now :-)

    You can build a https://rufus.ie USB stick with modified ISO contents
    and run the Setup.exe from it, and install Windows 11. the interface of Rufus has some tick boxes for disabling blocker checks of various sorts. If you
    have an E8400 or an E7500, those don't have POPCNT, and Rufus does not disable that check, because if you bypass that check, the OS will (it is claimed) crash on the next boot.

    If you did a legacy (MSDOS) install of Windows 10 back in 2015, or you installed
    windows 10 32-bit, these would be examples of bad things. There is an assumption
    of a GPT disk setup, and a 64-bit OS. You can use MBR2GPT.exe utility, to switch
    over to GPT, but that only works for the simplest disk setup, and it is not without issues. So there are some issues that aren't "health issues" but they will never the less cause a rollback or a refusal.

    Do a full backup of your hard drive, before acting, and make sure no excess disks are present (depending on the kind of install you end up doing). The usual rules about "safe" install practices apply.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Oliver on Tue Feb 4 11:50:05 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Oliver wrote:

    The "ways to install" the operating system have recently been
    revised, and there are now no official workarounds for installing
    the latest Windows release to unsupported, older machines.

    None of the workarounds were ever official (on Home and Pro editions of
    Win11).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Oliver on Tue Feb 4 07:35:14 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2/4/2025 3:15 AM, Oliver wrote:

    All I want to test for is the presence (or not) of just the most critical mandatory Windows-11-required hardware as I won't have the nice-to-have

    I'm not an expert on this, but I have a laptop
    that's an i3, and a self-assembled box with an i5
    and TPM disabled. Both have Win11 in a dual boot.
    The latter is 24H2. In neither case did it complain.

    That seems to be in conflict with the reported
    restrictions. In both cases I just downloaded the
    ISO. So I wonder if it's possible that the restrictions
    only apply if you offer up your system to MS to do
    with what they will?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Paul on Tue Feb 4 14:09:22 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    Paul <[email protected]d> wrote:

    [About Windows 11 on unsupported hardware:]

    This stuff does not come with a "money back guarantee".

    We can only cover the high points and "hope for the best".

    It may mean the install process looks a bit empirical.
    And takes more than one try to get right.

    Exactly. There's no guarantee that 1) you'll get new updates, nor 2)
    that you can manually get and install new updates, nor 3) that you can
    get and install new versions.

    So for a daily driver, you need to be willing and prepared for to get
    stuck with an out-of-support system, i.e. like a 7 or 8.1 or ('soon') 10 system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 4 08:39:59 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Tue, 2/4/2025 7:35 AM, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 2/4/2025 3:15 AM, Oliver wrote:

    All I want to test for is the presence (or not) of just the most critical
    mandatory Windows-11-required hardware as I won't have the nice-to-have

    �� I'm not an expert on this, but I have a laptop
    that's an i3, and a self-assembled box with an i5
    and TPM disabled. Both have Win11 in a dual boot.
    The latter is 24H2. In neither case did it complain.

    � That seems to be in conflict with the reported
    restrictions. In both cases I just downloaded the
    ISO. So I wonder if it's possible that the restrictions
    only apply if you offer up your system to MS to do
    with what they will?


    This stuff does not come with a "money back guarantee".

    We can only cover the high points and "hope for the best".

    It may mean the install process looks a bit empirical.
    And takes more than one try to get right.

    On the Optiplex 780, I tried to Upgrade install
    Win10 21H2 to 22H2. The install ran for an hour and
    rolled back. I didn't have any evidence as to what
    exactly happened, but on a hunch, I put in a different
    video card, and the install completed. That is an example of
    something the "Health Check" did not catch.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MummyChunk@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 4 21:13:23 2025
    Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Paul <nospam> wrote:

    [About Windows 11 on unsupported hardware:]

    This stuff does not come with a "money back guarantee".

    We can only cover the high points and "hope for the best".

    It may mean the install process looks a bit empirical.
    And takes more than one try to get right.

    Exactly. There's no guarantee that 1) you'll get new updates, nor 2)
    that you can manually get and install new updates, nor 3) that you can
    get and install new versions.

    So for a daily driver, you need to be willing and prepared for to get
    stuck with an out-of-support system, i.e. like a 7 or 8.1 or ('soon') 10 system.



    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.


    This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683159301#683159301

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Oliver@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Feb 4 15:36:01 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:50:05 +0000, Andy Burns <[email protected]> wrote

    The "ways to install" the operating system have recently been
    revised, and there are now no official workarounds for installing
    the latest Windows release to unsupported, older machines.

    None of the workarounds were ever official (on Home and Pro editions of Win11).

    The referenced article used the word "official" so I repeated it.

    I suspect they meant the word "official" to indicate that the instructions
    how to port legacy machines to Windows 11 came directly from Microsoft.

    They're warning us, I guess, that Microsoft doesn't publish how to do it. https://www.techspot.com/news/105894-microsoft-now-officially-allows-windows-11-installation-unsupported.html

    Microsoft even apparently published how to remove the persistent watermark. https://www.techspot.com/news/97748-how-remove-unsupported-pc-watermark-windows-11.html

    The problem I have, of course, is that my legacy BIOS has no TPM hardware. https://www.techspot.com/news/105834-microsoft-windows-11-requirement-tpm-20-chip-non.html

    But luckily I'm not the only one who is still "stuck" on the Windows 10 OS. https://www.techspot.com/news/105801-market-share-surprise-windows-10-popularity-increasing.html

    As Windows 11 users are finding more & more hardware that's not compatible. https://www.techspot.com/news/105736-windows-11-24h2-now-incompatible-usb-scanning-devices.html

    It seems more than half of Windows users are like me, still on Windows 10. https://www.techspot.com/news/106223-end-windows-10-support-year-threatens-over-60.html

    However, slowly but surely, people are giving up & going to Windows 11. https://www.techspot.com/news/106617-windows-11-reaches-highest-market-share-windows-10.html

    I won't purchase security updates, but they last only 1 year anyways. https://www.techspot.com/news/105391-microsoft-consumers-purchase-security-updates-windows-10-after.html

    For now, this is the official way supported by Microsoft to install Win11. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Notice that's the same link (but different text) as in the archives. https://web.archive.org/web/20240929145620/https:/support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Anyway, I will likely have to finally learn how to use Rufus I guess. https://www.techspot.com/downloads/6062-rufus.html

    Or maybe Ventoy?
    https://www.techspot.com/downloads/7286-ventoy.html

    The procedure has to be well documented for me to even try to risk it.
    Where if there is critical missing hardware, I am doomed to fail at it.

    Which is why I'm asking what is the critical hardware for Windows 11?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to MummyChunk on Tue Feb 4 19:49:06 2025
    On 2/4/2025 4:13 PM, MummyChunk wrote:


    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.


    That's true. I use a Win7 box for streaming movies. The
    woman I live with is still using mostly XP. I'm not concerned with
    Windows per se. I don't much care about updates. But Win7
    is no longer supported by browser makers and will gradually
    be unsupported by other software. For now it's fine. FF115 ESR
    is up to date. But in a year or two it might start to get iffy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Char Jackson@21:1/5 to MummyChunk on Tue Feb 4 19:13:35 2025
    On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:13:23 +0000,
    [email protected]d (MummyChunk) wrote:

    Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Paul <nospam> wrote:

    [About Windows 11 on unsupported hardware:]

    This stuff does not come with a "money back guarantee".

    We can only cover the high points and "hope for the best".

    It may mean the install process looks a bit empirical.
    And takes more than one try to get right.

    Exactly. There's no guarantee that 1) you'll get new updates, nor 2)
    that you can manually get and install new updates, nor 3) that you can
    get and install new versions.

    So for a daily driver, you need to be willing and prepared for to get
    stuck with an out-of-support system, i.e. like a 7 or 8.1 or ('soon') 10
    system.



    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.

    I use XP, 7, 8.1, and 10 on a daily basis. I keep the 10 updated,
    although I couldn't really tell you why. The others don't get, and I'd
    say don't need, updates. They work fine, as is.

    This whole feeling of unease when an OS stops receiving constant updates
    seems to be manufactured by the maker of the OS. Everything is sunshine
    and roses when it's new, but in short order it's so rotten that it needs
    to be 'updated'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to John C. on Wed Feb 5 04:02:22 2025
    John C. wrote:
    Newyana2 wrote:
    MummyChunk wrote:

    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.

      That's true. I use a Win7 box for streaming movies. The
    woman I live with is still using mostly XP. I'm not concerned with
    Windows per se. I don't much care about updates. But Win7
    is no longer supported by browser makers and will gradually
    be unsupported by other software. For now it's fine. FF115 ESR
    is up to date. But in a year or two it might start to get iffy.

    Excellent point, Newyana2. And this is why I'm giving serious
    consideration to running two computers from this point:

    1. an air-gapped one running Windows 7
    2. another for accessing the internet and running a bare minimum of
    programs for doing so.

    File transfers via thumb drive or portable hard drive, often after
    running anti-malware scans on such files.

    Forgot to mention that the second computer would be running either
    Windows 10 or some Linux distro. Not likely that I'd ever run W11 or
    newer (yes, talk about a W12 is beginning to rear its ugly head already.)

    --
    John C.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Char Jackson on Wed Feb 5 12:10:50 2025
    On 2025-02-05 01:13, Char Jackson wrote:

    On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 21:13:23 +0000,
    [email protected]d (MummyChunk) wrote:

    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.

    I use XP, 7, 8.1, and 10 on a daily basis. I keep the 10 updated,
    although I couldn't really tell you why. The others don't get, and I'd
    say don't need, updates. They work fine, as is.

    This whole feeling of unease when an OS stops receiving constant updates seems to be manufactured by the maker of the OS. Everything is sunshine
    and roses when it's new, but in short order it's so rotten that it needs
    to be 'updated'.

    I use Win 7 as my main PC, I'm typing this on it, and, note, its
    browsers, anti-malware, and Windows Defender are all still being updated
    as and when required.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John C.@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 5 03:53:05 2025
    Newyana2 wrote:
    On 2/4/2025 4:13 PM, MummyChunk wrote:


    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.


      That's true. I use a Win7 box for streaming movies. The
    woman I live with is still using mostly XP. I'm not concerned with
    Windows per se. I don't much care about updates. But Win7
    is no longer supported by browser makers and will gradually
    be unsupported by other software. For now it's fine. FF115 ESR
    is up to date. But in a year or two it might start to get iffy.

    Excellent point, Newyana2. And this is why I'm giving serious
    consideration to running two computers from this point:

    1. an air-gapped one running Windows 7
    2. another for accessing the internet and running a bare minimum of
    programs for doing so.

    File transfers via thumb drive or portable hard drive, often after
    running anti-malware scans on such files.

    --
    John C.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham J@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Wed Feb 5 12:55:41 2025
    Java Jive wrote:

    [snip]

    I use Win 7 as my main PC, I'm typing this on it, and, note, its
    browsers, anti-malware, and Windows Defender are all still being updated
    as and when required.


    +1

    However I am aware of other Win 7 users whose browsers (Firefox, Chrome)
    do not work with their banking websites (TSB specifically). Rather than
    add a more modern W11 (or W12) machine I've suggested a cheap Chromebook
    for banking websites only.

    --
    Graham J

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to John C. on Wed Feb 5 09:28:14 2025
    On 2/5/2025 6:53 AM, John C. wrote:

    consideration to running two computers from this point:

    1. an air-gapped one running Windows 7
    2. another for accessing the internet and running a bare minimum of
    programs for doing so.

    File transfers via thumb drive or portable hard drive, often after
    running anti-malware scans on such files.

    I've read that the CIA does that. The only organization,
    apparently, with the common sense not to put their databases
    online for "convenience". But it seems like an awfully lot of
    trouble for normal use. And transferring files via USB stick
    would potentially compromise security.


    For people who understand nothing of computers, letting
    Microsoft handle their system is probably a necessary evil.
    However, if you're somewhat handy then keeping up
    with the MS services dripfeed is neither desirable nor necessarily
    safer.

    Look at a list of patches in a month. Here's a typical sample
    from Sept 2024:

    https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Microsoft+September+2024+Patch+Tuesday/31254

    Most of the issues are potential elevation of privilege,
    remote execution, or bugs in MS software. Most problems
    can be avoided with basic security: Minimize script in the
    browser, email and office programs, and PDF programs.
    Avoid script, period. Use a good firewall. Don't use remote
    execution software. If you can call into your computer
    remotely then you're a sitting duck. Avoid MS software.
    They make great stuff, but they always put functionality
    far ahead of security. (Executable code in an office doc is
    wildly reckless.)

    This is all common sense on a SOHo install.
    Microsoft's bug fixes are especially aimed at corporate
    workstations where employees are running restricted and
    there's no protection from the network.

    In short, a SOHo machine should have all the windows and
    doors to the outside locked. A corporate machine has the front
    door wide open, but all inside cabinets and rooms are locked.
    One trusts the user but not the outside. The other is the
    reverse.

    What do you get beyond patches you shouldn't even need
    with MS patches? You get
    the odd fixed 0-day vulnerability. But if you avoid MS
    software in the first place, and avoid risky businesss like
    Remote Desktop, then the main attack vector is either
    the browser or tricks, like emails that appear to be from
    your bank. (You also shouldn't be reading email online
    in a browser. It should be read text-based and it shouldn't
    be able to load remote images. TBird blocks remote by default,
    so it's hard for anyone to imitate your bank, the IRS, etc.)

    So MS patches are not useless. But how useful are they?
    Not very. And there's always a risk of problems. People forget
    that newsgroup discussions didn't used to be mostly about
    what broke in the latest dripfeed update from MS or Mozilla.

    I was using XP as my main computer until less than a year
    ago. I've never had malware. I haven't run AV software since
    about 2000. But I know how to be careful.

    Despite my frequent criticism of MS, I've been pleasantly
    surprised with Win10 and even Win11... at least after some
    2 weeks of hunting down fixes and tweaks. For people wary
    of Win11, I've found it quite usable, aside from the glaring
    issue of the broken taskbar. But even that's fixable. And the
    update seems to often work on systems where officially it
    shouldn't. However, I would add the one caveat that neither
    one of these systems should be used without blocking out
    Microsoft from unexpected intrusions and unwanted changes.

    Unless you actually want to be a halfwit left prattling with
    Copilot, you need to seriously consider ongoing security from
    MS. Win11 is probably destined to be a shopping service for
    fools -- a consumer product more than a productivity tool.
    (I just read yesterday that a Copilot button is being added
    to Paint.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Char Jackson@21:1/5 to John C. on Wed Feb 5 17:55:43 2025
    On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 03:53:05 -0800, "John C." <[email protected]> wrote:

    Newyana2 wrote:
    On 2/4/2025 4:13 PM, MummyChunk wrote:


    Alot of people still use Windows 7 with absolutely no issues.


    � That's true. I use a Win7 box for streaming movies. The
    woman I live with is still using mostly XP. I'm not concerned with
    Windows per se. I don't much care about updates. But Win7
    is no longer supported by browser makers and will gradually
    be unsupported by other software. For now it's fine. FF115 ESR
    is up to date. But in a year or two it might start to get iffy.

    Excellent point, Newyana2. And this is why I'm giving serious
    consideration to running two computers from this point:

    1. an air-gapped one running Windows 7
    2. another for accessing the internet and running a bare minimum of
    programs for doing so.

    File transfers via thumb drive or portable hard drive, often after
    running anti-malware scans on such files.

    If thumb drives and portable hard drives ever get to be annoying,
    remember that it's trivial to set up a private network between your two
    PCs that only those two PCs know about. Your Windows 7 box wouldn't have Internet access and wouldn't be reachable from the Internet. It would
    only be able to communicate with your other PC. This would not affect
    your Internet access on your main PC. Just something to keep in mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Oliver on Thu Feb 6 13:26:12 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2025-02-04 08:15, Oliver wrote:

    But they provided a wayback machine snapshot of the missing page. https://web.archive.org/web/20240929145620/https:/support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Thanks for this. The Registry hack there has enabled me to begin an
    upgrade from 10 to 11 which is happening on my second PC right now,
    currently at 57%. We'll see how it goes.

    BTW, if you have hibernation enabled on the build to be upgraded, and
    you receive a message concerning insufficient disk space, just
    temporarily turn off hibernation during the upgrade, and turn it back on
    once the upgrade is completed and you have deleted the old files from
    the previous OS that it leaves hanging around. You can do this during
    the upgrade by running a command prompt as Administrator, giving the
    command ...
    powercfg /h off
    ... returning to upgrade window, and clicking Refresh. Obviously, you
    use ...
    powercfg /h on
    ... to re-enable hibernation post upgrade once you have cleared
    sufficient disk space.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Thu Feb 6 17:04:03 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    On 2025-02-06 13:26, Java Jive wrote:

    On 2025-02-04 08:15, Oliver wrote:

    But they provided a wayback machine snapshot of the missing page.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20240929145620/https:/support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77ac7c70e

    Thanks for this.  The Registry hack there has enabled me to begin an
    upgrade from 10 to 11 which is happening on my second PC right now,
    currently at 57%.  We'll see how it goes.

    Success!

    This is on a Dell Precision M6800, which originally failed because:
    - Not secure boot
    - Only TP 1.2
    - CPU

    Normally I use MBR partitioning, so am very unfamiliar with GPT, but
    from within Windows booted from MBR I took a spare disk and partitioned
    it as GPT, and imaged it with my current W10Pro build (derived from my
    W7Ult build with all my chosen software, customisations, etc). However
    I couldn't get it to boot. After some fiddle-faddle getting to be able
    to boot via USB from within UEFI, I ran a start-up repair, but this
    failed to cure the problem. After many and various attempts, all of
    which failed, I just installed Windows 10 from scratch, and then
    overwrote the result by imaging it again with my own build, and finally
    that worked, and I had my W10Pro image booting via secure boot off a GPT partitioned disk.

    In that build, I set the registry hack given in the above page linked by
    the OP, Oliver, which was:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup\MoSetup
    Name: AllowUpgradesWithUnsupportedTPMOrCPU
    Type: REG_DWORD
    Value: 1

    Then I ran the upgrade from a standard USB stick with a standard MS 24H2
    iso - ie: AFAIAA, no Rufus customisations - and, so far, it seems
    fine ... Well, as fine as any modern installation of Windows will ever
    be! Why o why do they have to change the taskbar and menus AGAIN!

    My feelings about this remind me of a Monty Python sketch where (this
    from memory) John Cleese in a pinstripe suit, bowler hat, and carrying a briefcase and a furled umbrella and a folded copy of 'The Times' is
    walking down the street and is waylaid by a reporter who asks: "Sir, how
    would you solve the problem of the poor?", to which he replies: "First I
    think we should bomb their houses to get them running out into the
    street, and then we should mow them down with machine guns. Of course,
    I understand that my views are not popular, particularly with the poor,
    but, really, I think it's the only solution!" Likewise, I think that
    any Microsoft programmer who makes needless changes to the GUI for
    change's sake should be taken out and shot. Of course, I understand
    that my views are not popular, particularly with Microsoft programmers,
    but, really, I think it's the only solution!

    However, to mollify me somewhat, for today as my login screen Spotlight
    gives me a very pretty photo of a carpet of bluebells in a steepish
    clearing in a Dorset wood, luvverly:
    https://windows10spotlight.com/images/29120

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)