XPost: alt.free.newsservers, news.admin.peering, news.software.nntp
<
[email protected]> wrote:
you seem to see the diminishment of Usenet services by ISPs as a result
of a crusade against child porn.
Did you receive the letter that AT&T sent to all its cable customers
when they killed their NNTP servers? I did. I received that letter.
It was bullshit. Pure political bullshit. Stupid people believed it.
Oh, AT&T. They care so much for the kiddies. They're saving them.
They "teamed up" with the NY sleazebag Cuomo trying to make a name for
himself as "a good guy with simple solutions" to very complex problems.
If you ask me why they teamed up with that NY sleazebag Cuomo, I suspect
you already know that answer based on what you wrote below, in fact.
i think it had far more to do with broadband allowing for increased
volume of bandwidth thus network, hardware, and administrative costs of hosting news servers significantly went up and fast and the child porn
issue was merely a convenient excuse of ISPs to shut them down and
save money.
I agree. You could actually tell, in those days, how little they supported
NNTP servers because their instructions came with POP3/IMAP4 setup instructions, but you had to call and go up a few support levels to get
their NNTP server setups.
I'm not an employee of a cable company but I suspect they inherited the
NNTP setup just as they inherited the POP3/IMAP4 setup, and they weren't expecting the explosion in NNTP data, particularly I guess in binaries.
I don't actually know much about their business model, but what I did know
at the time was that dropping _all_ of Usenet was too simple of a solution.
You don't see that as a phony issue?
No.
Whenever you see a politician (or a company, as in the case of AT&T),
propose a too-simple solution to a rather complex problem, there's a good chance there's a _lot_ more to the issue than they are pretending it to be.
You can use Prohibition, as one (currently non-contentious) example, but
let's not stray too far into politics since the topic is free news servers.
I can't get Rocksolid to work even though they gave me credentials.
I tried every news server setting proposed so far in this newsgroup. rocksolidbbs.com:119
rocksolidbbs.com:563
news.novabbs.org:119
news.novabbs.org:563
None work for me.
(login/password supplied by <
[email protected]> RetroBBS Registration)
Do any of those server:port combinations work at all for you?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)