On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:09:31 -0500
"Atreyu -> Oli" <
[email protected]> wrote:
On 27 Mar 20 09:50:36, Oli said the following to Atreyu:
Most important thing is to keep the idea of geographical regions
alive. This how fidonet always worked. No? There were no mandatory
geographical regions the beginning? Anyway, it is in the POLICY
and there is no way to change it
I get all warm-n-fuzzy when you write the word policy in all
uppercase... as if to assert your superior knowledge over that
clueless redneck dumbass ZC1.
Is this you very humble, well-spoken, educated guess? I wonder what your intention was when you used uppercase in words like BINKD, NODELIST, NETmail,...
Anyway, using uppercase is just a habit from the MS-DOS days:
https://www.net229.org/POLICY4.TXT
I assume this is for me not taking your troll-bait in FSX_GEN some
time ago.
Btw, congratulations for fixing the missing REPLY kludge in the software that you use on FSXNet as a reaction to my "troll-bait" (but maybe you are talking about other delusions).
Its really nice and pretty to have geographical regions to seperate
nets into, but the vanity has long faded and the RC position is that
of a traffic-cone.
So POLICY4 is obsolete? ;)
Its just there to direct people where to be listed.
Which is exactly the problem. If people decided by themselves which region, network they want to join, nobody would have to wait for a ZC to replace an RC.
We all know how power works in Fidonet. ZC nominates RCs, RCs elect ZC. If ZC does not like RC, he
* Origin: (21:1/151)