I don't like Fox News that much, but I stay tuned anyway. I noticed that they are paying way too much attention to a Democrat Nominee for US Senate named Abdul El-Sayed.

One day it was "El-Sayed is an extremist," the next day it was "El-Sayed doesn't like Usha Vance," and today it's "El-Sayed doesn't like Dolly Parton."

All this attention they're paying is going to distract Michigan voters from whoever El_sayed is running against. When they fill out their ballots, the only name they're going to recognize is "El-Sayed," and if they are careless, then that's the one that's going to trigger their marker.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

I don't like Fox News that much, but I stay tuned anyway.

Well, they ARE Controlled Opposition. So I always take what they say/do with more than a few grains of salt.

All this attention they're paying is going to distract Michigan voters from whoever El_sayed is running against.

So that means we need to focus on Mike Rogers.

Whenever the Media is saying "look over there!" we need to look at what they are trying to distract us from.

When they fill out their
ballots, the only name they're going to recognize is "El-Sayed," and if they are careless, then that's the one that's going to trigger their marker.

I doubt that. Abdul is offensive on so many levels that the Dems had to cheat to make him the winner in the Primaries.

Did you know that the voter turnout in Detroit was nearly 200% of registered voters? Ya, tell me that there's no "voter fraud" again.

The problem here is that Abdul is not electable. Actually neither was his challenger in the Primary, Haley Stevens, for that matter.

So why the distraction? What's wrong with Mike Rogers? But it doesn't matter.
Mike will win the election (unless the Democrats cheat again) because Abdul is unelectable.


... Luxuriantly hand-crafted from only the finest ASCII.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Whenever the Media is saying "look over there!" we need to look at what they are trying to distract us from.

I'm hoping that more and more people start seeing it that way.

So why the distraction? What's wrong with Mike Rogers? But it doesn't matter. Mike will win the election (unless the Democrats cheat again) because Abdul is unelectable.

"If the Democrats cheat again" is not iffy. They're going to try something, but maybe since it's a US election maybe the USSC's ruling on mail-in ballots will be of assistance.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

"If the Democrats cheat again" is not iffy. They're going to try something,

They did in the Primaries. That's how Abdul "won". Stevens was ahead and there was a "late night ballot drop for Abdul". Interestingly Detroit had a nearly 200% turnout for the Primaries.

but maybe since it's a US election maybe the USSC's ruling
on mail-in ballots will be of assistance.

It will make it harder. Now we need Federal Agents securing the polls to stop late night ballot drops and the Dems from running the same batches of ballots through the machines multiple times.


... This is your brain. Postscript on brain your is This.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

They did in the Primaries. That's how Abdul "won". Stevens was ahead
and there was a "late night ballot drop for Abdul". Interestingly
Detroit had a nearly 200% turnout for the Primaries.

This surprises me because I firmly believe that all Democrats are the same.

There could be only 1 explanation for why they care about which puppet wins a primary: favorability. Maybe they think that El-Sayed has a better chance of defeating the Republican than the other Democrats do. After all, they do seem to be investing a lot into Fox News.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

This surprises me because I firmly believe that all Democrats are the same.

I discovered long ago that they are not. Speaking for only those Democrats in political office, there are:
1. Communists.
2. Puppets.
3. Wokies (who are basically puppets because they have no brains of their own. eg. AOC)

There could be only 1 explanation for why they care about which puppet wins a primary: favorability. Maybe they think that El-Sayed has a
better chance of defeating the Republican than the other Democrats do. After all, they do seem to be investing a lot into Fox News.

Abdul has no chance of winning a fair election. Stevens didn't have any chance either. So both candidates were awful for the Democrats.

But I think the point that's slipping by is this:
The Democrat Leadership wanted Stevens. She's stupid, fake, etc. and a perfect puppet.
But someone took over the Michigan Voter Fraud Machine to pump up Abdul - and did it WITHOUT the leadership's approval.

This means that the Voter Fraud Machine is NOT under Democrat control. It's under DSA control.

This puts our SoS, and the Dems, in a very bad spot. If they expose the machine, most of them go to prison for rigging elections for years (this Machine has been in place for a LONG time), but they prevent the Communists from winning.
Or say nothing, let the Machine do it's job, but we'll "elect" a Communist.


... Life is a game. Money is how we keep score.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

If this is true (and not a hoax) then they (typical Democrats) must realize that there's a problem with their rigged voting system; it's
not rigged properly if candidates from outside their bubble are able to (1) wander in and (2) win a primary. I thought they were on top of
these things.

They thought they were on top of things too. That's what shocked them.

I still can't believe that they're 2 different groups, and I'll never
be able to think of them as individuals. Look how they behave in
congress. I can't expect that a "DSA Democrat" is going to vote any differently from a "Soros Democrat." As long as they do what China
wants, then I'm convinced that they're well on their way to becoming successful feudalists.

They are different in how they want to accomplish things.

Both groups believe that they should be in charge of everything because they are just so much better than us plebes.

But the Soros Democrats want a society where they run everything and everyone else has nothing.

The DSA Democrats want communism - which ends up in exactly the same place as the Soros Democrats.

But under comminism, the Soros Democrats have nothing - which is why there's a division.

We need to be aware of the difference because their followers have different goals.
Soros Democrats want power, money and control, but also want a populace that generates that money and have someone to control.
DSA Democrats are lazy, useless people who want to make the useful, productive people work for them.

We can't expect that the "good Democrats" are smart enough to save themselves from their own monsters.

There are no "good Democrats".

Another thing to beware of: The
socialists can just as easily infiltrate the Republican party, if they haven't already.

And you can bet that they have.

We all are, if Republicans don't ever get a game plan.

We can't expect the Republican's to be our savoirs. The best we can do is use that party to save our country.


... I don't have all the answers, just those that count.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Both groups believe that they should be in charge of everything because they are just so much better than us plebes.

But the Soros Democrats want a society where they run everything and everyone else has nothing.

The DSA Democrats want communism - which ends up in exactly the same
place as the Soros Democrats.

But under comminism, the Soros Democrats have nothing - which is why there's a division.

Putting this all together, it sounds like the remnants of a democracy are appealing to the Soros Democrats because it gives them an excuse to not call themselves "Communists" and it also gives them the opportunity to provide high paying jobs to a larger group of scumbags (think Nancy Pelosi's daughter, George's son, Hunter, Chelsea, etc.)

But under an openly Communist government, there would be a stricter ruling class, and there wouldn't be much opportunity for little Hunter.

We can't expect the Republican's to be our savoirs. The best we can do
is use that party to save our country.

Of course not, but they are a tactic at this point. If enough people vote for them it strengthens the lesser of 3 evils.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

Putting this all together, it sounds like the remnants of a democracy
are appealing to the Soros Democrats because it gives them an excuse to not call themselves "Communists" and it also gives them the opportunity
to provide high paying jobs to a larger group of scumbags (think Nancy Pelosi's daughter, George's son, Hunter, Chelsea, etc.)

But under an openly Communist government, there would be a stricter
ruling class, and there wouldn't be much opportunity for little Hunter.

Yup. For us, the outcome is the same. For them, it's who's in charge - and who gets the power/wealth.

Of course not, but they are a tactic at this point. If enough people
vote for them it strengthens the lesser of 3 evils.

It will certainly help. But there are too many RINOs for the Republican Party to solve anything.


... If it works, rip it apart and find out why!
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Of course not, but they are a tactic at this point. If enough people vote for them it strengthens the lesser of 3 evils.

It will certainly help. But there are too many RINOs for the Republican Party to solve anything.

This is an issue that deserves way more attention than it gets.

The "DSA" faction adds a new twist on RINO technology and on media report deciphering. Now there are 2 different bosses they could be working for and it will be useful to know which one it is.

Something we know so far: The DSAs are even more capable in rigging elections than Mike Powell's Democrats are. That leads me to believe that they're more advanced than the old gang in other ways too.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

This is an issue that deserves way more attention than it gets.

Certainly. But, sadly, we can't wave our hand and fix everything at once. So we have to clean it up piece by piece.

The RINOs will get theirs soon. While they are a problem, they are a lesser problem right now than others.

The "DSA" faction adds a new twist on RINO technology and on media
report deciphering. Now there are 2 different bosses they could be
working for and it will be useful to know which one it is.

It's usually pretty easy to see: The DSA faction always slip up and say that they want to eliminate Capitalism. Like Talarico recently did.

All we need to do is listen and they will tell us exactly who they are.

Something we know so far: The DSAs are even more capable in rigging elections than Mike Powell's Democrats are. That leads me to believe
that they're more advanced than the old gang in other ways too.

I think you hit it.

But I wouldn't call them "advanced". More like "We aren't going to hide it and don't care if we get caught because we think there are no consequences."


... Runtime Error 6D at 417A:32CF: Incompetent User.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

It's usually pretty easy to see: The DSA faction always slip up and say that they want to eliminate Capitalism. Like Talarico recently did.

All we need to do is listen and they will tell us exactly who they are.

Right. We'll listen for clues. Something all 3 factions (soros, china, rinos) have in common is that none of them have a good poker face.

Something we know so far: The DSAs are even more capable in rigging elections than Mike Powell's Democrats are. That leads me to believe that they're more advanced than the old gang in other ways too.

I think you hit it.

But I wouldn't call them "advanced". More like "We aren't going to hide it and don't care if we get caught because we think there are no consequences."

That's mostly true but there can be consequences, it's just unlikely.

The masters of the "Socialist" puppets have experience in Communism, and the "Socialism" craze is just a stepping stone. Maybe President Xi or Putin noticed how openly stupid the Democrats are, so they decided to intervene (to steer the ship away from the iceberg, but it's still awfully icy out there.)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

Right. We'll listen for clues. Something all 3 factions (soros, china, rinos) have in common is that none of them have a good poker face.

Oh, we don't even get clues anymore. They are outright saying it now. In public. On camera.

But I wouldn't call them "advanced". More like "We aren't going to hide it and don't care if we get caught because we think there are no consequences."

That's mostly true but there can be consequences, it's just unlikely.

But getting more likely every day now. If not through the courts, then through the elections.

The masters of the "Socialist" puppets have experience in Communism,
and the "Socialism" craze is just a stepping stone.

Socialism is just soft Communism. And Communism always leads to the elimination of the individual which is Totalitarianism.

The root of the problem still is a group of people who believe that they can run our lives better than we can. Time and time again, they have been proven wrong. But every generation still has their "But I can make it work this time" person.

Maybe President Xi
or Putin noticed how openly stupid the Democrats are, so they decided
to intervene (to steer the ship away from the iceberg, but it's still awfully icy out there.)

Xi wan't to exploit other's wealth because he's destroyed his own country's ability to produce it. So they don't want America to fall. They just want it under "control" not understanding that the "control" is what kills America.

But we are back to the pipe dream of "I can make it work this time".


... Honk if you love obscene gestures.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

The root of the problem still is a group of people who believe that they can run our lives better than we can. Time and time again, they have

Big bosses like Soros, or minions like Hochul?

Hochul seems dumb, but not arrogant. She knows that she's nobody's hero.

But Soros seems smart and arrogant. He might actually think he's helping in some minor and indirect way, and that's why he calls himself "a philanthropist."

The new definition of philanthropist: a person who controls people by using their own money to abuse them. fil-an-thro-pist

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

The root of the problem still is a group of people who believe that they can run our lives better than we can. Time and time again, they have

Big bosses like Soros, or minions like Hochul?

Both. The only difference is that Hochul doesn't have the money/power to force her views on everyone else without help from someone like Soros.

Hochul seems dumb, but not arrogant. She knows that she's nobody's
hero.

Exactly. She's in the "Wannabee Elitist" category. She can't make it on her own, so the only way she can move is on someone else's coat tails.

But Soros seems smart and arrogant. He might actually think he's
helping in some minor and indirect way, and that's why he calls himself
"a philanthropist."

And that's usually where they start. They get their money through (as far as we know) legitimate means. Then they want to help.
But they don't understand how to help.

Example:
Take a drug addict who's living on the street. Give him a house and money and now he's a drig addict living in a house with cash for food and more drugs. He'll soon burn down the house making meth. Stop giving him money and he'll be back on the street tomorrow. In other words: Giving him something didn't change him and so he gets into the same problem as before.

And like most Elitists, if their policies fail, double down on those failed policies.

So now, they think that these people must be FORCED to act "correctly". And I think you can see the progression from there. After a generation or 2, the Elitists forget that they were supposed to be helping and start being very totaltaranist.

The new definition of philanthropist: a person who controls people by using their own money to abuse them. fil-an-thro-pist

Lefties like to change the definition of words to mean the opposite of what they actually mean.


... Solve the problems of the world: Vote anarchist.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Example:
Take a drug addict who's living on the street. Give him a house and
money and now he's a drig addict living in a house with cash for food
and more drugs. He'll soon burn down the house making meth. Stop
giving him money and he'll be back on the street tomorrow. In other words: Giving him something didn't change him and so he gets into the
same problem as before.

That's exactly what happens with the Soros puppets. He wastes ridiculous amounts of money on campaigns for candidates who are good at being monkey puppets but bad at making evil decisions without George's direct guidance.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

Example:
Take a drug addict who's living on the street. Give him a house and
money and now he's a drig addict living in a house with cash for food
and more drugs. He'll soon burn down the house making meth. Stop
giving him money and he'll be back on the street tomorrow. In other words: Giving him something didn't change him and so he gets into the
same problem as before.

That's exactly what happens with the Soros puppets. He wastes
ridiculous amounts of money on campaigns for candidates who are good at being monkey puppets but bad at making evil decisions without George's direct guidance.

And they don't want to actually FIX anything (especially the problems they created) because as long as those problems exist, they have an excuse to grab more power/money.


... Rudolph changed his nose to 500 watts. Blew a fuse.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)