Hello :)
Hello :)
Hi!
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)
-+- tg BBS v0.6.2
2:221/1.58@fidonet eb09ed67
Hello Brother!
** On Wednesday 02.12.20 - 12:53, Brother Rabbit wrote to Benny Pedersen:
Hello :)
Hi!
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)
-\+- tg BBS v0.6.2
Very nice. And I see that the alternative // service symbols
for Subj are working too! You are on a roll. Thanks.
--
../|ug
Hello :)Hi!
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)
2:221/360.0 5fc7db48
Hello, Brother Rabbit.
On 02/12/2020 12.53 you wrote:
Hello :)Hi!
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)
Well, Benny is quite old user. ?
Tommi
Well, Benny is quite old user. ?
In Fido, this emoticon looks funny. ;)
However, please note that messages from Fido to UTF-8 are notGreat. ;) But you replied with CP866, so it looks not so good anymore.
distorted in Telegram. This is good news.
https://brorabbit.g0x.ru/pic/5fc7f286.jpg
However, please note that messages from Fido to UTF-8 are not
distorted in Telegram. This is good news.
Great. ;) But you replied with CP866, so it looks not so good anymore.
https://brorabbit.g0x.ru/pic/5fc7f286.jpg
UTF-8 support in GoldED is not so good either.
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)Well, Benny is quite old user. �Fl��
Hello Tommi!
02 Dec 2020 20:22, Tommi Koivula wrote to Brother Rabbit:
As I can see, no more "New User" messages on Fido side. ;)Well, Benny is quite old user. ÂFlÿé
bah
--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2 (Linux/5.9.11-gentoo-x86_64 (x86_64))
* Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (2:230/0)
Well, Benny is quite old user. -�Fl|+|�
====
bah
Hmm.. CP/M does not support UTF-8? :)
Quoting Rob Swindell to Mauro Veiga <=-
Re: Re: qwk 25 char subj line
By: Mauro Veiga to AUGUST ABOLINS on Fri Jan 15 2021 10:54 am
The Bluewave standard accepts long titles and much more useful
information than QWK and QWKE. It is a pity that the developers
insist on poor QWK or a little better QWKE instead of adopting a
much higher standard like Bluewave.
I've looked at the Bluewave format several times over the years for consideration in supporting in Synchronet, and ever time I conclude
that it's hardly any better than QWK or QWKE and my extensions to QWK/QWKE (namely, the HEADERS.DAT file) blow Bluewave away. http://wiki.synchro.net/ref:qwk
I would say the "much higher standard" is actually Synchronet-extended QWK. :-)
And I agree, more developers should adopt it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 168:49:14 |
| Calls: | 12,097 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,823 |