@MSGID: 2:460/256 0000021a
@PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 1223717052
@REPLYTO 2:460/256 1223717052
@RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
SUBJ test #2
This test checks to see if the SUBJ command will be picked up anywhere in the line.
The following line has a SUBJ command.
Is SUBJ present on this line:
Does the line above have "i love tests"?
--- tg BBS v0.6.3
* Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
SEEN-BY: 124/5016 203/0 221/0 6 280/464 396/45 460/25 58 256 777 1124 SEEN-BY: 460/5858 5015/46 5054/30
@PATH: 460/256 58 280/464
@MSGID: 2:460/256 0000021a
@PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 1223717052
@REPLYTO 2:460/256 1223717052
@RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
SUBJ test #2
This test checks to see if the SUBJ command will be picked up anywhere in the line.
The following line has a SUBJ command.
Is SUBJ present on this line:
Does the line above have "i love tests"?
--- tg BBS v0.6.3
* Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)
SEEN-BY: 221/6 280/464 460/25 58 256 777 1124 5858 5015/46 5054/30
@PATH: 460/256 58
Hi, August!
09 䥢 21 20:49, August Abolins -> All:
@MSGID: 2:460/256 0000021a
@PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
@CHRS: CP866 2
@TGUID: 1223717052
@REPLYTO 2:460/256 1223717052
@RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
SUBJ test #2
This test checks to see if the SUBJ command will be picked up anywhere in
the line.
The following line has a SUBJ command.
Is SUBJ present on this line:
Does the line above have "i love tests"?
Isn't it better to try using FIDOTEST for tests? Use %LIST to get link.
--- tg BBS v0.6.3
* Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256) SEEN-BY: 221/6 280/464 460/25 58 256 777 1124 5858 5015/46 5054/30 @PATH: 460/256 58
Have nice nights.
Stas Mishchenkov.
I did not know that you added FIDOTEST.
BTW... the --SUBJ tests failed, meaning that the --SUBJ commands in the middle of the message were used and "disappeared" from the body of the message. See the original post in Telegram.
BTW... the --SUBJ tests failed, meaning that the --SUBJ commands in the middle of the message were used and "disappeared" from the body of the message. See the original post in Telegram.
On the contrary, everything went well. It worked exactly as I planned. The first occurrence of the command is accepted.
Ah.. so, all the --COMMANDs can appear anywhere in the body of a message?
On 09 Feb 2021, August Abolins said the following...
BTW... the --SUBJ tests failed, meaning that the --SUBJ commands in the
middle of the message were used and "disappeared" from the body of the message. See the original post in Telegram.
So you used the Subject command at the top of the message and again in the body?
From what I understand the 2nd instance should be ignored.
Quite right. This is how it works.
OK.. so the bot takes the first occurrences of --SUBJ and --CC followed by <CR> if they appear *anywhere* in the body.
The exception is the --TO command. That one needs to appear at the top.
CC is an exception, everything else uses only the first occurrence.
So you used the Subject command at the top of the message and again in
the body?
From what I understand the 2nd instance should be ignored.
CC is an exception, everything else uses only the first occurrence.
Ah yes.. That's because multiple --CC's are allowed. Got it!
So you used the Subject command at the top of the message and again i the body?
From what I understand the 2nd instance should be ignored.
Yes, and it is ignored.
So you used the Subject command at the top of the message andagain i
the body?
From what I understand the 2nd instance should be ignored.
Yes, and it is ignored.
That's what I thought. But I have to ask because it is my experience that new features aren't always understood by people exactly how they are meant towork.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 06:24:54 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,919 |
| Posted today: | 1 |