1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FIDONET.TELEGRAM

  • this is using Subj deeper in the message

    From August Abolins@2:460/58 to All on Sat Feb 6 21:58:14 2021
    Ooops, I mistyped the the Subj command in the previous test.

    Just testing (again) to see if Subj command works within body of a message *AFTER* the first (this) sentence.


    The Subj command was *ABOVE* this sentence.

    --- tg BBS v0.6.3
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sat Feb 6 19:59:40 2021
    Hi August,

    On 2021-02-06 21:58:14, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 2:460/58 00000211
    @PID: tg_BBS_v0.6.3
    @CHRS: CP866 2
    @TGUID: 1223717052
    @REPLYTO 2:460/58 1223717052
    @RealName: August Abolins 2:221/1.58
    Ooops, I mistyped the the Subj command in the previous test.

    Just testing (again) to see if Subj command works within body of a message *AFTER* the first (this) sentence.


    The Subj command was *ABOVE* this sentence.

    It worked! :)

    --- tg BBS v0.6.3
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/58)
    SEEN-BY: 124/5016 203/0 221/0 6 280/464 396/45 460/25 58 777 1124 5858 SEEN-BY: 5015/46 5054/30
    @PATH: 460/58 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sat Feb 6 11:13:38 2021
    Just testing (again) to see if Subj command works within body of a message *AFTER* the first (this) sentence.


    The Subj command was *ABOVE* this sentence.

    It worked! :)

    Neat, eh? I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature. :D
    --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Stas Mishchenkov@2:460/5858 to August Abolins on Sun Feb 7 08:12:16 2021
    Hi, August!

    06 䥢 21 11:13, August Abolins -> Wilfred van Velzen:

    It worked! :)

    Neat, eh? I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature. :D

    I haven't decided yet either. ;)

    Have nice nights.
    Stas Mishchenkov.

    --- ������ - �� ����� �� ��� ���������, �� 㦥 �� ����砥����.
    * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Stas Mishchenkov on Sun Feb 7 13:23:00 2021
    Hello Stas Mishchenkov!

    ** On Sunday 07.02.21 - 08:12, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to August Abolins:

    Neat, eh? I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature.
    :D

    I haven't decided yet either. ;)

    Of course I don't know your approach for detecting and
    processing the bookended double command symbols around a
    command, but why not start the parsing at the very beginning of
    the message and only assume all of them are done only when you
    detect the last pair (with the mandatory <CR>) and no start of
    the next "--command:--" ?

    That way, you can ignore a "--command:--" if it happens to
    appear later in the body of the message.

    Although I like the way "--command:--" works when the command is
    CC, so that the carbon copies can all be listed at the end of a
    message, when the command is SUBJ in the middle of the body,
    that is not so good. :/ I have to re-write the Fidonet/
    Telegram Guide so that the example usage of SUBJ doesn't
    disappear! :D

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.48
    * Origin: Mobile? https://t.me/joinchat/SPBwvE1gkHzEKAkapsHkdQ (2:221/1.58)
  • From Brother Rabbit@2:460/256 to August Abolins on Tue Feb 9 18:57:23 2021
    Hello Stas Mishchenkov!

    ** On Sunday 07.02.21 - 08:12, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to August Abolins:

    Neat, eh? I'm not sure if that is a bug or a feature.
    :D

    I haven't decided yet either. ;)

    Of course I don't know your approach for detecting and
    processing the bookended double command symbols around a
    command, but why not start the parsing at the very beginning of
    the message and only assume all of them are done only when you
    detect the last pair (with the mandatory <CR>) and no start of
    the next "--command:--" ?

    That way, you can ignore a "--command:--" if it happens to
    appear later in the body of the message.

    Although I like the way "--command:--" works when the command is
    CC, so that the carbon copies can all be listed at the end of a
    message, when the command is SUBJ in the middle of the body,
    that is not so good. :/ I have to re-write the Fidonet/
    Telegram Guide so that the example usage of SUBJ doesn't
    disappear! :D

    --
    ../|ug

    All except "CC:" is determined by the first occurrence. Further occurrences should be ignored. Isn't that so?


    --- tg BBS v0.6.3
    * Origin: Fido by Telegram BBS by Stas Mishchenkov (2:460/256)