On 3/12/22 16:55, faeychild wrote:
As a non gamer I have considered ditching the NVIDIA card and just using
the onboard graphics chip.
I've heard that it is more than adequate for standard video processes
and the extra graphic magic of the card is overkill
what has prompted this is the minimalist function provided by NVIDIA, compared to Windows drivers - printing is the same deal, and the need to
start the cooling fan on each boot. It's just bloody annoying.
I sometimes suspect that I am running a V-8 in a dodgem car to no benefit.
As seems to often be the case, the only answer we can give is, "it
depends." Your question is far too general and you didn't include enough information about your specific situation. For example:
1) Laptop or desktop?
2) What CPU? (That would indicate the potential for adequate integrated graphics)
3) How much RAM? (Integrated GPUs often use system RAM)
4) What do you mean by "standard video processes?"
My oldest "working" computer is a Dell Inspiron 5100, from 2002, maybe
2003. It has a 32-bit P4 and a whopping 2GB of RAM. It has the Radeon
RV200 GPU that it came with, on a replaceable AGP card that I could
upgrade - if I could find one. It's running 32-bit Xfce Mageia 8. It's
usable, but performance is wholly inadequate by today's standards. If it
had an integrated GPU to use, performance would probably be even worse.
My newest machine, with a motherboard from 2012 also considered old by
some, has a second-generation i5 and 16GB of DDR3 RAM, and I haven't
used a graphics card into it since I built it. It's using Mageia 8
Plasma with no problems whatsoever. It is my production machine. My most video-intensive activity might be some work with Gimp, although I don't
do anything heavy with it. Next up would be watching videos online.
(BTW, I've been running it for over an hour, can only hear the fans if I listen for them, and Psensor tells me the core temperatures are running
at a solid 31 degrees C.)
Second-newest is a 2010 HP Probook with a first-generation i3, also with integrated Intel graphics, and also trouble-free where video is
concerned. I guess I could add a video card using the expansion slot,
but I have that full providing me with USB 3.0 ports, so I don't want to.
In between those I have some machines with older AMD graphics cards.
They have slower CPUs, and less RAM. I believe they sit on the edge of
needing a dedicated GPU. They'd be OK without it, but I did notice a bit
of a performance boost with it.
you probably don't need a dedicated card with anything more modern than
my aging equipment, but like I said, it depends.
TJ
--- MBSE BBS v1.0.8 (Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:250/1@fidonet)